Site Renumbering (RENUM) BOF at IETF 80

2011-03-19 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Site Renumbering (RENUM) BOF at IETF 80 THURSDAY, March 31, 2011, 1520-1720, Congress Hall II Chairs: Brian Carpenter + TBD Sponsoring AD: Ron Bonica Mailing list: re...@ietf.org Subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/renum Description --- As outlined in RFC 5887, renumberin

Redirect to sip-implementors: was( Re: SIP UDP packet loss?)

2011-03-19 Thread Dean Willis
You'll probably get a million of these replies, but I'll try and head them off: Rather than the lists coped here (which deal with a wide variety of other topics), please try the SIP Implementors List: sip-implement...@lists.cs.columbia.edu Thanks! Sorry to the rest of the folks I'm spamming

Re: SIP UDP packet loss?

2011-03-19 Thread Sambasiva Rao MANCHILI
Hallo, A Correction in my mail >>This helped the packet loss to reduce by 70% but could not achieve 0% packet loss . This helped the packet loss to reduce by 10%. Before increasing buffers we have Faults rate of ~8 to 10% after increasing buffers we have fault rate of 0.9%. Thank you, Samba. On Sa

SIP UDP packet loss?

2011-03-19 Thread Sambasiva Rao MANCHILI
Hallo Sip Experts / Transport Group Experts, I am not a SIP expert of application layer. I am part of Test System Development where we simulate the SIP traffic over different transport types like UDP,TCP and SCTP. When we are simulating just SIP signalling messages between our two test systems at