Re: Differences between RFC4944 as distributed by tools.ietf and datatracker.ietf / rfc-editor

Hi, (I only now became aware of this thread. Bob Hinden forwarded the original message to me, but I didn't note at the time that it was a list message.) Anyway, here's the story: The tools site never overwrites existing RFCs, so if it would happen that a RFC by mistake had been placed in the R

PSK with IKEv2

Hi all Yesterday, the IESG has started last call on three documents: - draft-harkins-ipsecme-spsk-auth-03 - draft-shin-augmented-pake-03 - draft-kuegler-ipsecme-pace-ikev2-05 All three seek to improve the authentication in IKEv2 when using pre-shared keys, as compared with RFC 5996. The IPsecME

revising an Internet Standard

IMHO draft-housley-two-maturity-levels is in good shape. I have one clarifying question. In RFC 2026, Section 6.3 ("Revising a Standard") states in full: A new version of an established Internet Standard must progress through the full Internet standardization process as if it were a comp

discussion about timezone database

Folks, there will be a discussion of draft-lear-iana-timezone-database and related issues this Wednesday at IETF 80 in Prague. The room will be Karlin 1 and the time slot is 08:00-09:00 local time. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Si

Re: Call for a Jasmine Revolution in the IETF: Privacy, Integrity, Obscurity

Hi Joel, RFC 2804 "IETF Policy on Wiretapping" was written by the IESG and the IAB. >From the abstract: The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has been asked to take a position on the inclusion into IETF standards-track documents of functionality designed to facilitate wiretapping

Re: [IPsec] PSK with IKEv2

(Co-author hat on) PACE (draft-kuegler-ipsecme-pace-ikev2-05) negotiates its own use during IKE_SA_INIT by exchanging a notification that signifies that both peers support the extension. I would recommend that the other two protocols be extended with a similar exchange of notifications. Then t

Re: revising an Internet Standard

I think this is correct for adding a feature. However, I could support an exception for removing a feature or a handling a straightforward errata. Russ On Mar 27, 2011, at 7:50 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > IMHO draft-housley-two-maturity-levels is in good shape. I have one > clarifying ques

New version of xml2rfc released

A new version of xml2rfc (v1.36) has been released, as well as updates to the xml2rfc web service running at http://xml.resource.org. Major new web features include: * New options in web form to generate ePub and PDF. * New option in web form to show trace and warning messages a

For Monday's technical plenary - Review of draft-tschofenig-post-standardization-00

On 3/23/2011 12:12 AM, Peterson, Jon wrote: > The purpose of this plenary is not to say that this web architecture should > be the exclusive focus of the Apps Area, nor to delineate some specific set > of work that should be replaced by something else. Forgive my confusion, but that appears to b

Thank you, IETF!

Dear IETF friends, The national police department of Japan reported on March 26th regarding the number of killed people by the earthquake and tsunami as 10,489 and also reported that 16,621 people are not yet found. Thus the total number of lost people is expected to be 27,000 or more. This is cer

Re: Thank you, IETF!

Jun: Only the Japanese would apologize for focusing their attention at home after a 9.0 earthquake and the tsunami it caused. We wish you well. Fred On Mar 27, 2011, at 6:00 PM, Jun Murai wrote: > Dear IETF friends, > > The national police department of Japan reported on March 26th > regard