Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-grow-geomrt-01

2011-04-26 Thread Roni Even
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-grow-geomrt-01 Reviewer:

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03.txt (IPv6 AAAA DNS Whitelisting Implications) to Informational RFC

2011-04-26 Thread Pekka Savola
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, The IESG wrote: The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Operations WG (v6ops) to consider the following document: - 'IPv6 DNS Whitelisting Implications' draft-ietf-v6ops-v6--whitelisting-implications-03.txt as an Informational RFC This is an ops-dir review

Late comment on draft-ietf-sippping-sip-offeranswer-14

2011-04-26 Thread Elwell, John
I know last call finished already, but the following has just been brought to my attention: In section 5.2.5 Changing the o-line, except version number value, during the session is an error case. The behavior when receiving such a non-compliant offer/answer SDP body is

Re: Gen-art review of draft-lear-iana-timezone-database-03

2011-04-26 Thread Eliot Lear
Hi Elwyn, Thank you again for the review. Please see below. Summary: Almost ready for the IESG. This is my second review of the document. I suggested in the previous review that it might make life easier, particularly if an appeal was ever entered, if the document didn't use the RFC

RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-mif-current-practices-09.txt (Current Practices for Multiple Interface Hosts) to Informational RFC

2011-04-26 Thread pierrick.seite
Thanks for the review. I've modified the draft according to your comments. Please see inline for more details. BR, Pierrick -Message d'origine- De : SM [mailto:s...@resistor.net] Envoyé : lundi 25 avril 2011 16:31 À : ietf@ietf.org Cc : Margaret Wasserman; SEITE Pierrick

Document Action: 'Suite B in Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME)' to Informational RFC (draft-housley-rfc5008bis-01.txt)

2011-04-26 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Suite B in Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME)' (draft-housley-rfc5008bis-01.txt) as an Informational RFC This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an IETF Working Group. The IESG contact person is

Document Action: 'Requirements for a Working Group Charter Tool' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-genarea-charter-tool-09.txt)

2011-04-26 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Requirements for a Working Group Charter Tool' (draft-ietf-genarea-charter-tool-09.txt) as an Informational RFC This document is the product of the General Area Open Meeting. The IESG contact person is Russ Housley. A URL of this Internet Draft

Re: Experimental RFC to be: draft-frejborg-hipv4-14.txt

2011-04-26 Thread The IESG
The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Hierarchical IPv4 Framework' draft-frejborg-hipv4-14.txt as an Experimental RFC. The IESG would also like the IRSG to review the comments in the datatracker (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-frejborg-hipv4/) related to this document and