Re: Another reason not to return :-)

2011-10-02 Thread Huub van Helvoort
Hej Ole, You wrote: Maastricht Bans Cannabis Coffee-Shop Tourists http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-15134669 A ban on some foreign tourists has come into force in the cannabis-selling coffee shops of the Dutch border city of Maastricht. Do you mean that the majority of IETF is

Re: Another reason not to return :-)

2011-10-02 Thread Ole Jacobsen
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011, Huub van Helvoort wrote: Hej Ole, Do you mean that the majority of IETF is cannabis user? In that case the IETF should cancel the Taipe meeting because cannabis is a schedule 2 narcotic in the ROC, and possession can result in up to 3 years imprisonment. BR,

Re: [IETF] Re: Another reason not to return :-)

2011-10-02 Thread Warren Kumari
On Oct 2, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote: On Sun, 2 Oct 2011, Huub van Helvoort wrote: Hej Ole, Do you mean that the majority of IETF is cannabis user? In that case the IETF should cancel the Taipe meeting because cannabis is a schedule 2 narcotic in the ROC, and possession

RE: GenART LC review of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01

2011-10-02 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Hi Roni, thanks for your comments. Two things in reply: First, this is not an Informational document, it's Standards Track. I don't know if that changes anything in your review, however. Second, Section 1 does describe the change being made between RFC3462 and this document, and the rationale

RE: GenART LC review of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01

2011-10-02 Thread Roni Even
Hi, My mistake about the document type (cut and paste problem) As for me comment about multipart/report as part of another multipart MIME message, what will happen when an implementation based on RFC3462 will receive the report according this document. Will it be processed, ignored or take