The IAOC published an RFP for the development of functional specifications for
Remote Participation Services on 19 October
and received six proposals. Many thanks for the thoughtful proposals. The
IAOC is pleased to announce it has awarded the
contract for the development of the
+1
I also wonder how the ADs manage to read the documents for their own WGs when
the agendas are this late. It's a lot of reading.
On Nov 7, 2011, at 11:24 PM, SM wrote:
Hello,
Since it is important that working group members have adequate time to
review all documents, it would be
From: SM [s...@resistor.net]
Since it is important that working group members have adequate time
to review all documents, it would be good if relevant WG documents
are made available at least two weeks before the start of the WG
session. Could the IESG please do something so that
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Cullen Jennings
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 7:12 AM
To: SM
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Adequate time to review all WG documents
+1
I also wonder how the ADs manage to read the
Hi Dale,
At 07:20 08-11-2011, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
Well, all of the *drafts* for these WGs have to be published by now,
as I-D submission has been cut off. So you can review them.
I predict that there will be a flood of I-Ds on Monday. The
availability of I-D issue is not specific
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/08/2011 11:05 AM, SM wrote:
Hi Dale,
At 07:20 08-11-2011, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
Well, all of the *drafts* for these WGs have to be published by now,
as I-D submission has been cut off. So you can review them.
I predict that there
which particular wg's do you plan to attend for which you are having
problems understanding what you need to read?
most of us have been here before
randy
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
At 11:47 08-11-2011, Randy Bush wrote:
which particular wg's do you plan to attend for which you are having
problems understanding what you need to read?
Multrans posted an agenda. I do not have any problem understanding
what I need to read if I follow that BoF. Joel Halpern and Cullen
Hi David,
The penalty for getting a quick response for the first time is that the second
response takes longer :) Inline.
- The additional text in section 3.1 stating that the policy URI is a shared
secret with a forward reference to the security considerations section
removes
