> Given these tasks an Executive Director should ideally:
> + Have sufficient time available and be able to allocate that time to
>IAB tasks when needed. For example, it is preferable that the
>candidate not be chair of more than one IETF WG, or a member of the
>IESG or IAB. The Execut
There are three pages exposed at the datatracker that have become stale
or are producing erroneous information.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/ann/ind/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/ann/new/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/ann/prev/
Has anyone been using those links?
The first link, in
Hi, Thomas,
Thanks for your help in the talent search!
I haven't seen a reply to your note, but it's worth mentioning that the
IAB ExecDir is no longer responsible for weekly telechat minutes, and at
least some of the IT/web responsibilities performed by previous ExecDirs
are moving to the se
Hi,
On 2011-12-16 09:20, Robert Sparks wrote:
> There are three pages exposed at the datatracker that have become stale
> or are producing erroneous information.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/ann/ind/
"IESG Statements on Independent Submissions"
This is in theory very useful information. I
Cyrus Daboo wrote:
I am not convinced the use of Depth in sync report is violating the
definition in 3253. In some ways it is a matter of how you look at the
sync. Your viewpoint is that the report asks the collection for its
changes - in that case, yes, Depth:0 would apply. The other view is
Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2011-12-14 18:01, Ken Murchison wrote:
Cyrus Daboo wrote:
I am not convinced the use of Depth in sync report is violating the
definition in 3253. In some ways it is a matter of how you look at the
sync. Your viewpoint is that the report asks the collection for its
chan
On 14/12/2011 18:27, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
A member URI MUST be reported as changed if its mapped resource's
entity tag value (defined in Section 3.11 of [RFC2616]) has changed
since the request sync-token was generated.
It should be mentioned that this only works well with resources
that are
On Dec 14, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> I am not sure if this is an architectural misunderstanding V a red herring.
Let's call it an architectural misunderstanding.
> As you say, NetConf is for *configuring* routers. RPKI-rtr is not used
> for router configuration, but rather dynamic
Total of 53 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri Dec 16 00:53:02 EST 2011
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
20.75% | 11 | 20.68% |91257 | julian.resc...@gmx.de
9.43% |5 | 8.47% |37395 | evniki...@gm
