On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 01:57:30PM -0700, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Applications Area Working Group
WG (appsawg) to consider the following document:
- 'The about URI Scheme'
draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt as a Proposed Standard
I read this
Hi Adrian,
I do not support such a view, and it is not supported in a plain reading
of RFC 2026. What's more, it's not how researchers work. Researchers
naturally move on. If we are looking to further push researchers away
from the IRTF, this is a good way to do it.
Whether or not an
RFC 2026 says this about Experimental RFCs:
The Experimental designation typically denotes a specification that
is part of some research or development effort.
However, I do not believe that this is still typical. Authors come up with
ideas that they think are useful. If when the
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:17:46AM +0300, Yoav Nir wrote:
The Experimental designation typically denotes a specification that
is part of some research or development effort.
However, I do not believe that this is still typical. Authors come up with
ideas that they think are useful.
