On 2012-05-23 18:56, Dave Crocker wrote:
Folks,
g'day.
There are periodic questions about ABNF that go beyond the specifics of
a specification attempting to use it.
While these are not hot topics, they do occur periodically. Also, there
is support material (software, documentation) for ABNF
Hi Roni,
On 20/05/2012 07:47, Roni Even wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may
Sam,
Thanks for addressing my comments in draft-ietf-emu-chbind-16.txt.
I'm happy with this version. All my substantive concerns are addressed.
I do see two non-substantive issues. These can be addressed in some
future version or not at all.
1) The word subvert is misspelled as subvirt in the
For what it is worth, here is my opinion on this subject (which I was
asked to post here).
I see possible privacy law problems with posting the blue sheets, so
I would not.
I see a good reason to scan and have images of new blue sheets, make
it easier to respond to subpoenas.
I do see a
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like
Hello All
Had a question on RFC 3315, Section 18.1.2 Creation and Transmission of
Confirm messages
When a client changes its configuration from dhcpv6 enabled to static ipv6,
is this considered as moving to a new link and is the client required to
send out a Confirm message ?
Thanks
pradeep
On May 24, 2012, at 16:12, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
For what it is worth, here is my opinion on this subject (which I was
asked to post here).
I see possible privacy law problems with posting the blue sheets, so
I would not.
I see a good reason to scan and have images of new blue sheets,
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 19:12 -0400, Samuel Weiler wrote:
With that said, there are some things that need clarification, and the
doc sorely needs an editorial pass. As-is, the doc is not ready for
publication. I will be happy to review the doc again once it's been
thoroughly edited.
It
Hi,
I was trying to register for IETF 84 and tried the link
http://www.ietf.org/meeting/register.html from the main site.
Sometimes it takes me to the IETF 80 page (registration over) and
sometimes it takes me to the right note well page.
Trying to replicate the issue, I am seeing that it works
Please sent it to ietf-act...@ietf.org.
Bob
On May 24, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Vinayak Hegde wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to register for IETF 84 and tried the link
http://www.ietf.org/meeting/register.html from the main site.
Sometimes it takes me to the IETF 80 page (registration over) and
For what it is worth, here is my opinion on this subject (which I was
asked to post here).
I see possible privacy law problems with posting the blue sheets, so
I would not.
I see a good reason to scan and have images of new blue sheets, make
it easier to respond to subpoenas.
I do
Vancouver IETF Codesprint
When: Saturday, 28 July 2012, starting at 9:30 AM
Where: IETF Hotel
What: A bunch of hackers get together to work on code for the
IETF. All code will become part of the open source IETF tools.
Who: Hopefully you can help
Many of the results of previous
On 5/23/12 2:16 AM, SM wrote:
Hi Peter,
I understand why the intended status is not BCP. I suggest taking into
account the wider audience feedback to determine whether the it should
not be made clearer.
OK, Tim and I will look into perhaps adding a sentence or two about this.
A question
Hi Peter,
At 15:01 24-05-2012, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Even if a document is mentioned in a charter as a likely starting point,
the chairs still need to make an explicit call for adoption of that
document as a WG item.
Ok.
The slides and audio are part of the record.
The audio seemed like
On 5/24/12 5:10 PM, SM wrote:
Hi Peter,
At 15:01 24-05-2012, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Even if a document is mentioned in a charter as a likely starting point,
the chairs still need to make an explicit call for adoption of that
document as a WG item.
Ok.
The slides and audio are part of
Total of 59 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri May 25 00:53:03 EDT 2012
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
8.47% |5 | 5.54% |25712 | ra...@psg.com
6.78% |4 | 7.16% |33268 | stpe...@stpeter.im
A new IETF non-working group email list has been created.
List address: core-paramet...@ietf.org
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/core-parameters/
To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core-parameters
Purpose: The list will serve as the discussion list for expert
Vancouver IETF Codesprint
When: Saturday, 28 July 2012, starting at 9:30 AM
Where: IETF Hotel
What: A bunch of hackers get together to work on code for the
IETF. All code will become part of the open source IETF tools.
Who: Hopefully you can help
Many of the results of previous
18 matches
Mail list logo
