AFNIC's Technology Backdrop Survey (2nd edition): your input highly appreciated

[It is not *directly* related to IETF work but I assume that the goal is shared by many people here: try to find about the future of the Internet. Do note that most questions about what you *wish* will happen but about what you *think* will happen.] To that end, with the help of its Scientific Cou

Re: [BEHAVE] WG Review: Recharter of Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave)

Hi Cullen, I would assume the MIB module would be written in a way to be IP version agnostic. But I'm not sure the NAT technologies are version agnostic. And I'm not sure that the current NAT-MIB can support the version-agnostic addressing textual conventions (I haven't looked yet). I have simila

Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mile-template-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mile-template-04 Reviewer: Pet

Re: Vl: Last Call: (Improved Recursive DNS Server Selection for Multi-Interfaced Nodes) to Proposed Standard

Finally :) Lets hope the I-D has only fair weather going forward.. On 5/26/12 12:21 AM, "Savolainen Teemu (Nokia-NRC/Tampere)" wrote: >Here we go... Let's see what happens. This has just been 3.5 years in the >process... > >Teemu > > alkuperäinen viesti >Lähett.: ext The IESG >Lähet.:

RE: [spfbis] Last Call: (Resolution of The SPF and Sender ID Experiments) to Informational RFC

> -Original Message- > From: spfbis-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:spfbis-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > The IESG > Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 5:44 AM > To: IETF-Announce > Cc: spf...@ietf.org > Subject: [spfbis] Last Call: > (Resolution of The SPF and Sender ID Experiments) to Information

Re: Long discussion about IETF on the Internet Governance Caucus mailing list

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 06:34:09PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 04:19:28PM -, > John Levine wrote > a message of 8 lines which said: > > > Based on what I've seem on the IGF list, people with an > > extraordinary amount of free time. > > In some cases ("RFC

Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-claise-export-application-info-in-ipfix-05

Hi Roni, [keeping only the open discussions] Hi Benoit, Thanks, see in-line Roni I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any oth

RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-claise-export-application-info-in-ipfix-05

Hi Benoit, Your proposals are OK with me Roni From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bcla...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 2:11 AM To: Roni Even Cc: draft-claise-export-application-info-in-ipfix@tools.ietf.org; gen-...@ietf.org; 'IETF'; me Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-claise-e