Hello Stephen, others,
On 2012/06/23 6:20, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Hi All,
I went back through the IETF LC comments and think that we've
resolved them all on the list and have the changes in this
version [1] of the draft, with the possible exception of those
below.
The issues raised but not
Hi Martin,
On 06/25/2012 11:35 AM, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
Hello Stephen, others,
On 2012/06/23 6:20, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Hi All,
I went back through the IETF LC comments and think that we've
resolved them all on the list and have the changes in this
version [1] of the draft, with
comments inline
On 6/20/12 11:53 AM, James Lentini jlent...@netapp.com wrote:
Below is the Gen-ART review comments for the FedFS admin protocol.
-james
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:31:42 -0400
From: Richard L. Barnes rbar...@bbn.com
To: ietf@ietf.org, The
On Jun 22, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
My understanding is that the option is encoded this way both for
extensibility and because the Valid-For parameter is solely a property of the
URI. Surely this is not the only instance of a DHCP option with a sub-option?
What's in the draft
Hi Tidd and All,
The General Area WGs focus on IETF processes and policies, I don't
think projects are done there,
So then would this WG also be an incubator for projects?
The IETF-WG I propose is only to do with IETF processes and policies
(procedures, and best practices), not incubator
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6640
Title: IETF Meeting Attendees' Frequently Asked
(Travel) Questions
Author: W. George
Status: Informational
Stream: IETF
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6641
Title: Using DNS SRV to Specify
a Global File Namespace with NFS
Version 4
Author: C. Everhart, W. Adamson,
J.
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
BCP 178
RFC 6648
Title: Deprecating the X- Prefix and
Similar Constructs in Application Protocols
Author: P. Saint-Andre, D. Crocker,
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6650
Title: Creation and Use of Email
Feedback Reports: An Applicability Statement for
the Abuse Reporting Format (ARF)
Author: J. Falk,
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6652
Title: Sender Policy Framework (SPF) Authentication
Failure Reporting Using the Abuse Reporting
Format
Author: S. Kitterman
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures'
(draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs-14.txt) as Best Current Practice
This document is the product of the Applications Area Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Barry Leiba and Pete
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Source Ports in ARF Reports'
(draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-05.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an
IETF Working Group.
The IESG contact person is Barry Leiba.
A URL of this
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
Disclosure Rules'
(draft-polk-ipr-disclosure-05.txt) as Informational RFC
This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an
IETF Working Group.
The IESG
The IESG has completed a review of draft-despres-6a44 consistent with
RFC5742. This review is applied to all non-IETF streams.
The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Native IPv6 Behind NAT44
CPEs (6a44)' draft-despres-6a44-02.txt as an Experimental RFC.
The IESG would also like the
14 matches
Mail list logo
