RE: IETF Nominations Committee Chair - 2012 - 2013

> I sincerely thank Matt for his willingness to take on this task as it requires a tremendous time commitment and dedication to do well. +1. It is indeed a huge effort for the Nomcom chair and all voting members especially between September and January. Cheers, Mehmet From: ext Mary B

Re: IETF Nominations Committee Chair - 2012 - 2013

+1 I agree to work with you, internet community and Mr.Matthew Lepinski, to progress the process for nominations, and make it successful, AB == If people work together as a team, best practices and success are reached ===

Re: Last Call: (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC

--On Friday, June 15, 2012 13:29 -0700 The IESG wrote: > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter > to consider the following document: > - 'Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page' >as Informational RFC > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks,

Re: Last Call: (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC

Based on many people's input (most recently, John's), I have updated the draft to more cleanly separate out the history of the Tao from the change that is happening. --Paul Hoffman A new version of I-D, draft-hoffman-tao-as-web-page-03.txt has been successfully submitted by Paul Hoffman and po

Re: Last Call: (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC

--On Thursday, July 05, 2012 14:19 -0700 Paul Hoffman wrote: > Based on many people's input (most recently, John's), I have > updated the draft to more cleanly separate out the history of > the Tao from the change that is happening. Paul, While I'd prefer to see you go even further in that di

Re: Last Call: (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC

I've read this version and think it's an excellent revision. Is there going to be a way of seeing a list of all the versions of the tao? Or links within tao.html to the previous version? Perhaps a www.ietf.org/tao/ should be maintained that has pointers to all the versions as well any proposed

Re: Last Call: (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC

On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Tony Hansen wrote: > Is there going to be a way of seeing a list of all the versions of the tao? > Or links within tao.html to the previous version? Perhaps a www.ietf.org/tao/ > should be maintained that has pointers to all the versions as well any > proposed update

Re: Last Call: (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC

I think my point was missed. Section 2 says: All published versions will be archived using URLs of the form . My question is: Where is there a list of all of the tao version files? How would one be able to find out the name of the previous version so th

Re: Last Call: (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC

--On Thursday, July 05, 2012 23:22 -0400 Tony Hansen wrote: > I think my point was missed. Section 2 says: > > All published versions will be archived using URLs of the form > . > > My question is: Where is there a list of all of the tao > version files?

Re: Last Call: (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC

Authoritative, no. But definitely referenced by many, many people and IMO worthy of a certain amount of care. Tony Hansen On 7/5/2012 11:57 PM, John C Klensin wrote: --On Thursday, July 05, 2012 23:22 -0400 Tony Hansen wrote: I think my point was missed. Section 2 says: All published v

Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org

Total of 41 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jul 6 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.32% |3 | 12.21% |44570 | mehmet.er...@nsn.com 7.32% |3 | 11.14% |40646 | abdussalambar

Re: Last Call: (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC

+1 I support all your suggestions (i.e. point 1 and 2, and nits i and ii ) , and hope that iesg, and editor agrees, and that the community considers them for progress. I seen the change in the draft-document-03 which I think getting better but still not satisfied The new vesion 3 draft (dated 5 J