Re: Last Call: (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC

--On Friday, July 06, 2012 00:28 -0400 Tony Hansen wrote: > Authoritative, no. But definitely referenced by many, many > people and IMO worthy of a certain amount of care. No disagreement about care. But it seems to me that adequate care requires keeping track of a future version, a current v

Re: Last Call: (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC

At 20:22 05-07-2012, Tony Hansen wrote: I think my point was missed. Section 2 says: All published versions will be archived using URLs of the form . My question is: Where is there a list of all of the tao version files? How would one be able to find ou

Re: Last Call: (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC

--On Friday, July 06, 2012 07:16 +0200 Abdussalam Baryun wrote: > +1 > > I support all your suggestions (i.e. point 1 and 2, and nits i > and ii ) , and hope that iesg, and editor agrees, and that the > community considers them for progress. I seen the change in the > draft-document-03 which I

RE: Last Call: (Common requirements for Carrier Grade NATs (CGNs)) to Best Current Practice

I have a comment about this document related to some discussions that I've had with a number of ADs and WG chairs around the formation and charter of Sunset4 to determine what is and is not in scope for that WG. For a while both BEHAVE and Sunset4 had this document in their milestones, which cl

Re: Comments for

Huh? Make tao a directory. Put the document in the directory as index.html. Now www.ietf.org/tao will redirect to www.ietf.org/tao/ will redirect to www.ietf.org/tao/index.html. Tony Hansen On 7/4/2012 1:54 PM, Russ Housley wrote: Julian: No, I was just trying to understand *why* the ar

Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-caa-10

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-pkix-caa-10 Reviewer: Richard

Re: Last Call: (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC

Hi John, Let's wait for the iesg and I trust they will find the solution after they read our comments. I beleive that your comments are sound, and will be taken by the iesg. If things turn against your suggestions there are some procedure-options to go forward, but I don't think will be in that di

The US Federal Communications Commission Technical Advisory Committee is discussing the end of POTS.

Aka the PSTN transition . http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/technological-advisory-council http://transition.fcc.gov/bureaus/oet/tac/tacdocs/TAC-WG-Ques-5-9-12.pdf Richard Shockey Shockey Consulting Chairman of the Board of Directors SIP Forum PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683 <