Re: copyright notices in RFC 6716

Simon: The authors wanted to grant additional rights beyond those that are granted by the TLP. They indicated those rights in Section 10 of the internet-Draft. This was challenged during WG Last Call, and it was challenged during IETF Last Call. In each case, the authors make their desire cl

Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-11

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-11 Reviewer: D

Re: copyright notices in RFC 6716

Russ, I can't seem to align what you say with the document content. The rights granted by the license text in the document (quoted below) appears to me be identical to the TLP except that the copyright header also includes non-authors. Is this what you refer to with granting additional rights?

Re: copyright notices in RFC 6716

On 9/18/2012 2:33 PM, Simon Josefsson wrote: Russ, I can't seem to align what you say with the document content. The rights granted by the license text in the document (quoted below) appears to me be identical to the TLP except that the copyright header also includes non-authors. Is this what

Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07,

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07 Reviewer:

Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07,

On Sep 18, 2012, at 8:18 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > y

Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-5738bis-09

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-eai-5738bis-09 Reviewer: Be

Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07,

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07 Reviewer:

Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07,

On Sep 18, 2012, at 8:18 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > y

Re: copyright notices in RFC 6716

Simon: The RFC contains the usual boilerplate and one additional paragraph. The rights granted in the additional paragraph align with the rights that the authors wanted to provide. Here is the additional paragraph: The licenses granted by the IETF Trust to this RFC under Section 3.c of

Re: copyright notices in RFC 6716

Todd: No. The additional rights are granted for RFC 6716, and there is no implication about any other RFC. Russ On Sep 18, 2012, at 5:47 PM, tglassey wrote: > On 9/18/2012 2:33 PM, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Russ, >> >> I can't seem to align what you say with the document content. The >> ri

Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-07 Rev

Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-simpledowngrade-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-eai-simpledowngrade-07 Revi

Re: copyright notices in RFC 6716

On 9/18/2012 6:52 PM, Russ Housley wrote: Todd: No. The additional rights are granted for RFC 6716, and there is no implication about any other RFC. I do understand that Russ, its the precedent I am worried about,. The process issues. My point also is that ID owners are not the only ones who

Re: Draft IESG Statement on Removal of an Internet-Draft from the IETF Web Site

On 9/16/2012 6:56 AM, Lawrence Conroy wrote: ... It is VERY useful to be able to search through drafts to see how we got here, AND to see things that were explored and abandoned. Thieves find it very useful to have what they steal. That doesn't legitimize their theft. Utility can determine