DKIM is Harmful as Specified

2013-05-12 Thread Douglas Otis
Dear ietf, To better clarify elements within otis-ipv6-email-authent draft, a separate I-D is focused primarily on DKIM. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-otis-dkim-harmful-00 Regards, Douglas Otis

Re: [ietf-dkim] Last Call: Change the status of DKIM (RFC 6376) to Internet Standard

2013-05-12 Thread Douglas Otis
Dear IETF, Sorry for repeating this message, but the proper subject line had not been used. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-otis-dkim-harmful-00 explains why this document should not be supported to proceed as currently defined. Feedback on this I-D is welcome. Regards, Douglas Otis

Review of: draft-otis-dkim-harmful

2013-05-12 Thread Dave Crocker
Review of: DKIM is Harmful as Specified I-D: draft-otis-dkim-harmful-00 Reviewed by: D. Crocker Review Date: 12 May 2013 Summary: DKIM is in wide use for email operations today; it is currently at Draft Standard and has been submitted for elevation to full Internet

Re: DKIM is Harmful as Specified

2013-05-12 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Dave has already commented on the confusing and rambling nature of this document, so I'll focus only on the core claim. In this document, Doug is re-raising an objection that was discussed long and hard in the DKIM working group during the development of RFC6376. The archives are still available