There must be something similar to Godwin's Law whereby any IETF discussion can
devolve into a debate over NAT. ;-)
Jason
On 7/12/13 10:13 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker
hal...@gmail.commailto:hal...@gmail.com wrote:
Keith, read my words, I choose them more carefully than you imagine.
solves their
On 7/13/2013 7:25 AM, Livingood, Jason wrote:
There must be something similar to Godwin's Law whereby any IETF
discussion can devolve into a debate over NAT. ;-)
It's not devolution, it's translation into our private context.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
On 7/12/13 12:24 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker
hal...@gmail.commailto:hal...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately the IAB is not going to give that advice. They seem to have
passed on advising ICANN not to issue .corp which is going to be a total
security meltdown.
The report at
From: Livingood, Jason jason_living...@cable.comcast.com
FWIW, I think for most larger companies with multi-billion dollar
revenues streams it is less about the up-front fees to apply
operationalize a gTLD than the long term business potential.
I guess I'm missing something.
On 7/13/13 12:27 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
From: Livingood, Jason jason_living...@cable.comcast.com
FWIW, I think for most larger companies with multi-billion dollar
revenues streams it is less about the up-front fees to apply
operationalize a gTLD than the long term
All the discussion details are overwhelming but I do seem to feel there
is a marketing and branding problem especially when it comes to
searching a domain at the USER DATA ENTRY LEVEL, i.e. slow keyboard input.
For example, I own WINSERVER.COM. Try typing WINSERVER in google (for
the first
I guess I'm missing something. How exactly is having a gTLD going to bring in
the Big Bucks? Do people actually type addresses into the address bars on
their browsers any more, or do they just type what they're looking for into
the search bar?
Let's just say you're not allowed to ask that
--On Saturday, July 13, 2013 16:28 + John Levine
jo...@taugh.com wrote:
I guess I'm missing something. How exactly is having a gTLD
going to bring in the Big Bucks? Do people actually type
addresses into the address bars on their browsers any more,
or do they just type what they're
On 7/13/2013 11:27 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
From: Livingood, Jason jason_living...@cable.comcast.com
FWIW, I think for most larger companies with multi-billion dollar
revenues streams it is less about the up-front fees to apply
operationalize a gTLD than the long term
On Jul 13, 2013, at 7:58 PM, Hector Santos hsan...@isdg.net wrote:
Try typing out my domain, winserver.com. First timers will not get the
WINSERVER.COM web site, but Microsoft's WIN SERVER 201x and/or WINDOWS SERVER
web sites first.
I did as you suggested earlier, and typed winserver, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FYI
Folks,
We finally put everything in place to announce the very first IPv6
Hackers meeting.
All the relevant info is available at::
http://www.ipv6hackers.org/meetings/berlin-2013
- cut here
IPv6 Hackers Meeting - Berlin 2013
**
On Jul 12, 2013, at 8:06 PM, Eric Burger ebur...@standardstrack.com wrote:
I kept my maiden name, too.
And I took my wife's last name when we married.
This caused no end of confusion at the marriage office, with their Borland C
Turbo Vision Text menu system app, with a space for a maiden
Reading some of this discussion leaves me puzzled because I can't tell
which things that some people are saying are intended to be about
dotless use of domains, or are intended to be about the expansion of
top level domains in general.
The IAB's statement does not seem to be about whether or not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
It could just be me but something about http://example doesn't feel
right, I'd rather have http://example.com over http://example
Regards,
Tom McLoughlin
On 13/07/2013 21:11, Ofer Inbar wrote:
Reading some of this discussion leaves me puzzled
14 matches
Mail list logo
