Why not provide a list of the potential problem topics to the Chinese
government (maybe via MIIT or SAC) and say that the IETF does have open
discussions in these areas, hence provided they accept this then IETF would
be delighted to have the opportunity to meet in Beijing. If China is not
willin
t should be noted that the duty to disclose IPR is NOT ONLY for the authors
of a draft, and the IETF "reminder" system seems to be focused solely on
authors. The duty to disclose IPR lies with any individual or company that
participates in the IETF not just authors.
Alan Clark
On 9/16/1
ETF patent policy is
implemented in a way that reduces the likelihood of litigation against
someone that implements a draft/ RFC/ standard.
Regards
Alan Clark
On 9/18/13 4:23 PM, "John C Klensin" wrote:
>
>
> --On Thursday, September 19, 2013 07:57 +1200 Brian E Carpenter
&g
