Hi Vinayak,
First, well done, I fully agree with your email. I have two
questions for you/the group:
1) I wonder if in your proposal you are considering some sort of
charge for remote participation. IMHO I do not think we are yet
prepare to charge.
2) When you mention that filling the
On 8/12/13, Vinayak Hegde vinay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Alejandro Acosta
alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Vinayak,
First, well done, I fully agree with your email. I have two
questions for you/the group:
I would add to your proposal some kind
On 7/26/13, John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com wrote:
Hi.
For a newcomer or someone expecting to write I-Ds, some of the
most important sessions at the IETF are the various Sunday
afternoon tutorials and introductions. Many of them are (or
should be) of as much interest to remote participants
that universities might be an excellent starting point.
I wonder if you have some ideas to shares in how to do this.
Thanks,
--
Regards,
Edwin
Alejandro Acosta,
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Melinda Shore
melinda.sh...@gmail.comwrote:
On 5/26/13 12:08 PM, SM wrote:
The elephant in the
room
Hello,
Just a small comment:
On 5/23/13, Jari Arkko jari.ar...@piuha.net wrote:
For what it is worth, I wanted to provide my perspective on this. I of
course believe that it is important that the IETF reaches out to an even
{...}
Just meeting in some place does not bring too many new
Hi,
I want to support Mikael's comment.
Meetecho worked really well, I used to connect using a regular
jabber client however using Meetecho really enriches the experience,
it was very nice to see the slides, to be in the jabber room,
everything in the same screen. I also had audio (In a
you know that young people do not use email as much as us?. Saying
that, this can be a good way to bring young people to IETF.
Alejandro Acosta,
{...}
I agree with this initiative.
Alejandro,
On 2/22/13, IETF Chair ch...@ietf.org wrote:
Jari has created a blog as an experiment to see if would be possible to
provide periodic status reports and other thoughts from the chair. Here's
the link:
http://www.ietf.org/blog/2013/02/chairs-blog/
Hi All,
In my humble opinion I totally agree with Arturo. So far I do know
several cities in Latin America and I believe Sao Paulo (Brazil) or
Cancun (Mexico) might be a good options. Of course there are many more
good cities, those ware the first two that came to my mind.
I hope IETF 100 can
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:29 PM, David Morris d...@xpasc.com wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, George, Wes wrote:
From: Joel jaeggli [mailto:joe...@bogus.com]
At least, we should start *trying* to get IPv6 service from hotels.
We may have a very hard time getting it, but the fact that
Hi Nathaniel,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Nathaniel Borenstein
n...@guppylake.comwrote:
Is there any reason we can't create this on wikipedia itself, e.g.:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RFC3514
The problem that I see in this case was mentioned previously by Keith and
Hector,
+1
I also support the idea of every RFC havving the associated wiki.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.orgwrote:
On Sep 16, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
On Sep 16, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
Again I would like to bring up the idea of
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Keith Moore mo...@network-heretics.comwrote:
On Sep 19, 2011, at 12:27 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 9/19/11 10:14 AM, Alejandro Acosta wrote:
+1
I also support the idea of every RFC havving the associated wiki.
I think that if some people support
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Marshall Eubanks
marshall.euba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Alejandro Acosta
alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Keith Moore
mo...@network-heretics.comwrote:
On Sep 19, 2011, at 12:27 PM
14 matches
Mail list logo
