Roni
Thank you for the review
My responses below prepended with [AA]
Andrew
From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 8:35 AM
To: draft-allen-dispatch-imei-urn-as-instanceid@tools.ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; gen-...@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART IETF LC review
SM
The past discussions on this took place a couple of years ago involving
primarily Cullen Jennings, Dale Worley and myself.
Andrew
- Original Message -
From: S Moonesamy [mailto:sm+i...@elandsys.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:20 AM Central Standard Time
To: Mary Barnes
.
Andrew
- Original Message -
From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thom...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 12:57 PM Central Standard Time
To: Andrew Allen
Cc: tb...@textuality.com tb...@textuality.com; ietf@ietf.org ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16
Temperature Moderate - and wet and foggy.
If you like to see the sun then you are unlikely to be happy in Vancouver in
November.
- Original Message -
From: Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal) [mailto:glenn.d...@nbcuni.com]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 07:05 AM Central Standard Time
To:
The reason why the IMEI namespace is being registered as a GSMA namespace and
not as part of the 3GPP namespace is that the GSMA has the responsibility for
IMEI assignment and hence in maintaining uniqueness of the namespace. It has
nothing to do with IPR which was extensively discussed on the
by IETF provides the
opportunity to add text to address privacy concerns with any inappropriate
usage.
- Original Message -
From: S Moonesamy [mailto:sm+i...@elandsys.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 06:50 PM Central Standard Time
To: Andrew Allen
Cc: scott.b...@gmail.com scott.b
is this more harmful for 4G
than the current situation with 2G and 3G if a mobile device is transferred to
a new owner?
Andrew
From: Andrew Allen [mailto:aal...@blackberry.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 11:48 PM Central Standard Time
To: tb...@textuality.com tb...@textuality.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
The URN containing the IMEI is used by all mobile phones that support voice
over LTE. It is a dependency for 3GPP release 8 (which was completed about end
of 2008). So yes it is going to be used and its more than 3 years of 3GPP work
invested and is already incorporated into many devices.
In
concerns from the IMEI being used as an instance
ID?
Andrew
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tb...@textuality.com]
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 10:58 AM Central Standard Time
To: Andrew Allen
Cc: ietf@ietf.org ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16.txt
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013
: Saturday, July 20, 2013 03:31 PM Central Standard Time
To: Andrew Allen
Cc: ietf@ietf.org ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16.txt
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Andrew Allen
aal...@blackberry.commailto:aal...@blackberry.com wrote:
The quote is from RFC 5626
I think IANA registration of namespaces has a lot of value.
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tb...@textuality.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 01:36 PM Central Standard Time
To: Andrew Allen
Cc: scott.b...@gmail.com scott.b...@gmail.com; sm+i...@elandsys.com
sm+i...@elandsys.com; ietf@ietf.org ietf
/
Is any more harmful than as the IMEI is used today by over 90% of mobile phones
in use today worldwide?
Andrew
- Original Message -
From: Scott Brim [mailto:scott.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 03:55 PM Central Standard Time
To: Andrew Allen
Cc: tb...@textuality.com tb
11:25 AM Central Standard Time
To: Andrew Allen
Cc: tb...@textuality.com tb...@textuality.com; ietf@ietf.org ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16.txt
On 19 July 2013 08:38, Andrew Allen aal...@blackberry.com wrote:
I suggest you also read
http
a lot further than RFC 5626 in addressing privacy of the instance ID in
that regard.
Andrew
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tb...@textuality.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 04:07 PM Central Standard Time
To: Scott Brim scott.b...@gmail.com
Cc: Andrew Allen; ietf@ietf.org ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re
[mailto:ra...@psg.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 05:48 PM Central Standard Time
To: Andrew Allen
Cc: IETF Disgust ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16.txt
I think IANA registration of namespaces has a lot of value.
let me ask the other side of the coin
with 2G and 3G if a mobile device is transferred to
a new owner?
Andrew
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tb...@textuality.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 07:01 PM Central Standard Time
To: Andrew Allen
Cc: scott.b...@gmail.com scott.b...@gmail.com; ietf@ietf.org ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last call: draft
Certainly text can be added to the draft to address concerns.
Could Tim please elaborate on what issues he sees when a device is transferred
between owners and what potential uses of the URN he has a concern with?
Certainly I can see that if it was used as address that had some permanence
Tim
I suggest you also read
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-allen-dispatch-imei-urn-as-instanceid/
That will explain the primary application of this URN which is intended for use
in the 3GPP cellular standards.
Andrew
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tb...@textuality.com]
Sent: Friday, July 19,
Tim
Do you not think that the text in the security considerations section::
because IMEIs can be loosely correlated to a user, they need to be treated as
any other personally identifiable information. In particular, the IMEI URN MUST
NOT be included in messages intended to convey any level of
I think that misses the point.
The WG sessions are where the issues are raised and the opinions and positions
are stated.
Offline over the food and drink in small groups is where the detailed
discussion and finding of solutions to resolve those issues usually takes place.
Such a phenomena is
Randy
I think that also assumes that the earth's rotation will also stop at some time
during the next decade forcing us all to migrate to the sunny side of the
planet.
Failing that happening then with 18 hours at least (Tokyo to US West coast) of
time zones (and that doesnt take into account
+1
We can put all kinds of wonderful constraints on hotels if we want to - make
sure they are enviromental friendly, non discriminatory in their hiring
practices, donate to save whales and all kinds of other worthy causes and do
things such as transitioning to IPv6 plus be really cheap and be
as
a free lunch!
- Original Message -
From: George, Wes [mailto:wesley.geo...@twcable.com]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 08:06 AM
To: Andrew Allen; flu...@cisco.com flu...@cisco.com
Cc: i...@ietf.org i...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: IPv6 support in hotel contract?
From
There likely are no such dates as there are telecommunications standards
meetings of one kind or another virtually every week of the year (except
Christmas and (western) new year).
Many other standards organisations depend on IETF standards so it is important
to avoid clashes with those
+1 with Adam
- Original Message -
From: Adam Roach [mailto:a...@nostrum.com]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 04:38 PM
To: Russ Housley hous...@vigilsec.com
Cc: IETF ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
I'd like to join the sparse voices in speaking out
I agree here with Hadriel.
If you don't have a badge because you didn't register and pay the fee then you
don't belong here. If you lost or forgot your badge then I'm sure the
secretariat would fix it and issue you a new one if you were registered.
I didn't notice any oppressive security
Well speech at IETF isn't free - it comes at the cost of 650 USD (advance
registration) or a bit more on the door. If random locals want to come and make
some kind of statement at IETF then all they have to do is come and do an on
the door registration (at a fee of course) and make their
Mary
It seems you now also need a support letter from your own company too.
When I tried to get my business visa for China last year they refused to
process my application without such a support letter. This was the first time I
had been asked for such a letter.
Andrew
From: Mary Barnes
As someone who has entered China at least 13 times I can say that for at least
US citizens and US residents the visa period usually starts the day of your
intended entry into China not the day you apply.
Obviously applicants need to BE AWARE and make sure the visa is valid for the
meeting
Yes. Now a support letter from your compnay seems to be essential. Don't leave
home without it :)
From: Clint Chaplin [mailto:clint.chap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:02 PM
To: Ole Jacobsen o...@cisco.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org ietf@ietf.org; JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
and determine if there is an
appropriate course of action in this matter to alleviate the concerns of
the community.
Your understanding is appreciated
Best regards
Andrew Allen
Manager Standards
Research In Motion Ltd
Office +1 847-793-0861 x20824
BlackBerry Mobile +1 847 809 8636
http
that in order to ensure we don't have any future backward
compatibility issues with other URI schemes we need to also include in
the document a statement that UAs that receive policyContactURIs with
URI schemes they don't understand in Policy-Contact headers must ignore
those policyContactURIs.
Andrew Allen
32 matches
Mail list logo
