Shouldn't this document be referred to MPLS WG and PWE3 WG so that we
can discuss the merits and demerits of allocating yet another request
for the code point...
The name of the document suggests it has to do with the official ITU
request for a code point ..but nowhere in the document does it ac
MPLS and behaves a lot like MPLS with "better OAM" characteristics
and then standardizing that protocol. I will fully support that protocol
except that it cannot be called MPLS. It is a new protocol.
Regards,
Azhar Sayeed
Cisco Systems Inc.
__
