Andrew G. Malis wrote:
I appreciate the potential difficulty of guaranteeing the unencumbered
status of any output of this group. However, I would like this statement to
be stronger, saying that this group will only produce a new codec if it is
strongly believed by WG rough consensus to either
Brian West wrote:
Wouldn't this go over the MTU on the RTP packets and cause some issues on the
public internet?
1. What's this?
2. Send packets more frequently.
--Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Ietf mailing list
