On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>
> On 3/14/2011 2:05 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>
>> 2) More substantively,
>>
>>"Any protocol or service that is currently at the Draft Standard
>> maturity level may be reclassified as an Internet Standard as soon as
>>
>> the
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:03 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2011/3/14, Brian E Carpenter :
>> There are numerous improvements in this version and I hope we
>> can get consensus soon.
>>
>> Just a couple of remarks on
>> 5. Transition to a Standards Track with Two Maturity Levels
>>
>
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:33 AM, James M. Polk wrote:
>>
>> Brian
>>
>> playing devil's advocate here...
>>
>> Say someone submits a request for an existing DS to the IESG and it takes
>> 6 months (or 3 months) to get through the proc
An ION (IETF Operational Note, see RFC 4693) is open for public comment
on the ietf@ietf.org list. Comments should be sent by 2007-02-12.
Please see
http://www.ietf.org/IESG/content/ions/drafts/ion-procdocs.html
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https
An ION (IETF Operational Note, see RFC 4693) is open for public comment
on the ietf@ietf.org list. Comments should be sent by 2007-02-12.
Note that some early reviewers have suggested that this document
is not really needed, since IETF minutes are already of a
good enough standard. Opinions on thi
[Discussion invited on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The IESG received a request under RFC 3933 to run
draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt as an experiment in loosening the IETF's
requirements for normative references in RFCs.
The experiment is composed of two parts. The first part allows
approved Internet Drafts
