My understanding is that the IESG (or some part of it) is having
the DNS text looked at by the DNS directorate.
Regards,
Brian
On Feb 4, 2005, at 15:29, Sam Hartman wrote:
"Tony" == Tony Hain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tony> and now the replacement ULA space is unable to be published
Tony>
IETF'ers,
I would like to raise an issue with everyone in Paris using the
IPv6 support provided by France Telecom and the volunteer NOC
squad. There are a few rogue client nodes advertising themselves
as IPv6 routers. Here is a list of the guilty parties:
1. MAC = 00:05:4E:43:51:AA
IPv4
On 1/27/13 10:07 AM, tglassey wrote:
So... we probably need a IPv6 update for BCP5 (RFC1918), doesnt that
make sense?
My understanding is people have been using ULAs (RFC 4193) for this type
of functionality.
Todd
On 3/14/13 4:31 PM, Eggert, Lars wrote:
Hi,
On Mar 14, 2013, at 16:26, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I haven't observed that many newcomers at the newcomer meet-and-greet.
They seem to be overwhelmed (numerically) by the ADs+chairs that go, which
is reinforced by ADs+chairs using it as a taking-c
Dave,
On 5/17/13 11:37 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 5/17/2013 7:01 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
But WGs should be able to periodically summarize what they're doing -
what problem they're trying to solve, what approach they're taking, what
technologies they're using, what major decisions they've made, w
On 6/19/13 11:08 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
My point, poorly expressed though it was, is that it's not productive
for us all to wait from word on high before taking positive action.
Members of the IESG, IAB, IOAC, or any other "official" body are just
folks who are temporarily serving the com
On 6/19/13 11:31 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 6/19/13 9:26 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:
On 6/19/13 11:08 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
My point, poorly expressed though it was, is that it's not productive
for us all to wait from word on high before taking positive action.
Members of the
Hi Hector,
On 7/20/13 11:47 AM, Hector Santos wrote:
Overall, I think the IETF has a marketing problem addressing its #1
customer base - electronic participants.
By this term, I assume (based on later text) you mean remote participants...
I was somewhat hoping to see more done in the mentor
Hi Dave,
I am not Jari, but I do have an opinion on your thoughts below...
On 7/29/13 1:25 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
I've been finding discussion and actions about newcomers far more
interesting this year, than most previous ones. So I think it's worth
pressing on several fronts, to see how
I want to thank everyone who has provided feedback on this draft. Given
the issues raised, I am sending the draft back to the LISP WG for
additional work. I encourage folks interested in this draft to
participate on the LISP mailing list.
Regards,
Brian
On 11/13/12 9:45 AM, The IESG wrote:
Hi Marcia,
On 9/18/13 11:54 AM, IETF Agenda wrote:
>
> You can still use the main reservation links provided on the meeting web page
> at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/88/hotel.html for both the Hyatt and Fairmont,
> but please let me know once you have made your reservation.
>
I have already m
11 matches
Mail list logo
