On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 14:44, IETF Chair wrote:
>
> There is no crisis, but there is a need for action so that the Internet can
> continue to grow. The transition to IPv6 requires the attention of many
> actors. However, our parents, spouses, and children will be largely unaware
> of the tran
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would suggest that the IESG also think about hosting all IETF lists in
> house in the future.
>
> The main reason for this is legal, a list that is maintained by the IETF
> is much more satisfactory in a patent
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Andrew G. Malis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> I would personally find this more useful if it were measured by
> subject line rather than by sender.
Thread metrics can be found all around the web if you're
interested. GMANE and MARC are just two su
2008/7/23 Huntak Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi.
>
> I'd like not to receive ietf mail any more in this e-mail address.
> please don't send mail to this e-mail([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The link appended to the bottom of every message distributed by
this list is what you want. Go to
https://www.ietf.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Fred Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 24, 2008, at 6:18 AM, Marc Manthey wrote:
>
>> marratech was aquired by google in 2005 , so i guess its not available
>> anymore ( was java by the way and a bit slow )
>
> I keep hearing this, and I use it every week
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Lixia Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I questioned the reporter why she ignored my request, the reply was that it
> was the magazine's policy not allowing preview --- something they never told
> me beforehand.
>
> One lesson learned.
Indeed. It may be wor
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Joel Jaeggli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Or you know not consenting to interviews with someone who's professionalism
> you don't respect. Why you would expect someone engaged in serious
> journalism or otherwise to offer you the opportunity to modulate your own
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Stephane H Maes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It may be an artifact of email or I may have missed some earlier relevant
> exchanges, but I am a bit surprised that it is announced for the first time ~
> 10 minutes before the event... Of course some of us can't att
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 17:46, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
>>
> It's happened to me twice, with two different lists of his. I've
> complained to him, but to no avail. I wonder if the CAN SPAM act
> applies.
Unfortunately, no, thanks to (deliberate?) loopholes and
shortfalls of the bill. The
On Dec 2, 2007 4:55 PM, Frank Ellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lixia Zhang wrote:
> > The remedy here may also include the cost to those people who
> > acted on a published RFC in its first 2 months.
>
> Yes, or months earlier, for the case I have in mind more than
> two years, millions of us
On Dec 6, 2007 8:59 PM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only part of the meeting fee is profit for the IETF and an even smaller part
> of the attendee costs. It cost my employer roughly $2,000 for me to attend
> the Vancouver IETF for two days. That is $6,000 for the IETF to m
On Dec 13, 2007 10:48 AM, Russ Housley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You need both physical (power, hardware, location) and
> > operational (different global prefixes, preferably different
> > AS's) diversity for reliable DNS.
>
> We knew about this problem, but choose to make th
On Dec 14, 2007 9:19 AM, Marshall Eubanks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know that there is work going on today with the transfer of
> services from NSS
> to AMS, and I suspect that these errors may be connected to this.
It may be, but according to Ray Pelletier (Administrative
Director), the
I had been on there during the holiday yesterday from home, and
just checked now from work. No problems from either place, Dan.
On Dec 26, 2007 3:25 PM, Dan York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is anyone else having trouble reaching http://tools.ietf.org ? Over the past
> few weeks I've found
On Jan 4, 2008 1:41 PM, Stjepan Gros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Does anyone know why is edu.ietf.org inaccesible? I'm constantly getting
> the following error messages:
>
> Fatal error: Table './ietfedu/sessions' is marked as crashed and should
> be repaired query: SELECT u.*, s.*, r.name
2008/2/4 Dan York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> FYI, Richard Stiennon at ZDNet noticed that the root servers will be
> IPv6-accessible and refers to it as the "Birth of IPv6":
>
> http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/?p=527
>
> He was pointing over to the BBC article about this:
>
> http://news.bbc.co.
On Feb 6, 2008 1:29 PM, Edward Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 8:37 -0800 2/6/08, $someone wrote:
>
> >The descriptions of the venue make clear that, once again, the IETF is
> >meeting
> >in a ghetto. Periodic bus service doesn't counteract that.
>
> I really have a hard time being sympathe
On Feb 13, 2008 2:05 PM, Henning Schulzrinne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a reasonably recent presentation on the state of IP
> address allocation that would be suitable for a class I'm teaching.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Henning
> ___
> Ietf mailin
On Feb 20, 2008 12:23 PM, lconroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> WTF - why am I REQUIRED to enter the ISO-3166 code for my country
> of residence.
[snip!]
> This is (if nothing else) a Fenian ploy.
[snip!]
> add United Kingdom (UK), you *&[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not sure where in your ra
On Feb 20, 2008 12:04 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip!]
> My browser (the latest version of Safari on the Mac) complains that
> the issuer of the certificate is untrusted. That would be Starfield
> Secure Certification Authority.
>
> Is this a CA in good standing that we s
Ray,
Which services will be affected by this (all, Tools & EDU, email)?
On Feb 20, 2008 12:52 PM, Ray Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AT&T, the IPv6 service provider for the IETF, is planning a major
> change in their IPv6 network on Thursday, 21 February, at 8am
> Eastern for
On Feb 20, 2008 1:16 PM, John C Klensin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On Wednesday, 20 February, 2008 13:03 -0500 Daniel Brown
> > Starfield Tech is the company from whom the certificate is
> > issued if you purchase an SSL certificate through GoDaddy.
>
> And
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Ofer Inbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Subject: IPv6 only Plenary Makes the News
>
> Isn't that just a press release from ISOC, being distributed by wire
> services online?
> -- Cos
Yes, that's correct. Still interesting to see it picked up by
other pub
23 matches
Mail list logo
