Document: draft-ietf-avt-register-srtp-02
Reviewer: Enrico Marocco
Review Date: 2010-04-22
IESG Telechat date: 2010-04-22
Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication as a Proposed
Standard. I found a minor nit that would be fixed by the Editor anyway.
Note: The main issue
Dean Willis wrote:
So all in all, I'd say I'm not comfortable with the idea of an IETF
meeting in the PRC at this time. Maybe, in a few years, if they open
up their Internet and cut back on the human rights abuses associated
with the users of our technology (making bloggers disappear is
Narayanan, Vidya wrote:
With respect to process, I think this one takes the cake among
abominations. Having been at the IETF long enough and having
participated in several BoFs, I'm quite familiar with RFC2418 and
the process. Here we have an effort that started with a
closed/gated
Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
The minutes (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08jul/minutes/alto.txt) say
this:
+++
Many people agreed that this is important work for the IETF, also some
(less) people hummed against. Hum was inconclusive - some of the no
hums were (in Jon's words)
Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
It's difficult to write a charter without actually designing the
solution.
This is an interesting opinion. May I translate that to mean that there
is already a solution in the minds of the people who wrote the charter?
Nope. Who has been following the p2pi list
