I can try pulling something together based on some of the numbers from
the messages that followed... When would you need them?
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 14:05 -0500, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
> I'm looking for a reasonably recent presentation on the state of IP
> address allocation that would be su
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 09:51 -0800, Bob Braden wrote:
> *> > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> *> ...
> *> > BCP NNN
> *> > RFC
> *> >
> *> > Title: Definitions of Managed Objects for
> *> > Hig
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 20:58 -0600, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> From: "Fred Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Do the Morality ADs get to wear funny clothes?
> >
> > Inquiring minds want to know...
>
> I would love to be on NomCom when they open the envelope and read the
> desired characteristics for
A nit, perhaps, but:
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 20:17 -0800, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
> ..Note that Real
> Player is available for multiple platforms for free, ..
The Linux version, last I tried [8.0.3.412], didn't include support for
multicast.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mess
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 16:53 +1200, Franck Martin wrote:
> I wonder if we could add to this list, that non digitally signed e-
> mails and invalid digitally signed e-mails get held for approval.
I don't think that will scale too well when the list gets active. And
white-listing someone once they'r
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 07:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think the original idea was better - to only have web archive of those
> posts that did not make it through to the main list...
The downside of this approach, though, is that one would lose the
context in which the discarded message was off
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 11:30, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Frank Solensky wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 06:22, Gibson, Mark wrote:
> > > >Finally, last para of sectin 4.5, "Mnemonics appearing in the
> > > Abstract"
> > > >and
Sorry, everyone, I know that the horse is long dead but my wife is a
tech writer:
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 06:22, Gibson, Mark wrote:
> >Finally, last para of sectin 4.5, "Mnemonics appearing in the
> Abstract"
> >and 'meaning of the mnemonics "IP" or "TCP" or "MIB"' -- you mean
> >acronym, not mnemo
At the risk of prolonging this thread:
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 21:43, Einar Stefferud wrote:
> One answer is to set up some kind of "Hardship Case" program to which
> hardship cases may submit an application for a special discounted
> registration fee, citing their hardship situation.
>
> I shou
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 12:20, Matt Crawford wrote:
> > In what layer is PPP in the TCP/IP=
> > =20suite?
>
> Layer 2.71828
I should have exp()ected that..
> OK.. TCP/IP in a refrigerator... a microwave... maybe. But Lego Blocks?
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/robotics/rcx/legos/?n=2247
I'm trying to picture how they might build a recursive firewall..
--Frank
> > Oh, I don't know, the flag for "G" ("I require a pilot") seems to
describe
> > us pretty well, also...
>
> Are you trying to imply we're rudderless??!!!
No, no: Palm Pilots..
Maybe we could use 'A' ("D(r)iver below, I am undergoing a speed trial") for
b@ke@ffs.
And I thought the last social was rough!
-- Frank
Jiri Kuthan wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> as the discussion departed from my original question to
> the favorite discussion on NAT/ipv6/etc architectural issues,
> I would like to re-raise the question:
>
> "is anyone aware of any estimations of fraction of Internet users
> who are behind firewalls and
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
> Frank,
>
> This is goodness. Can I ask that you publish the *method* before
> you publish any results? I have seen various attempts to
> tackle this in the past, and they have all given results that
> are very hard to interpret and whose meaning depends very much
> o
Tony Dal Santo wrote:
>
> What exactly is the state of the IPv4 "address pool"?
Hilarie Orman, Scott Marcus and I will be working together over the next
few weeks to get a more up-to-date view of the world. As soon as we get
something together, we'll announce it to the list.
The IPv6 working group had given this proposal all due consideration back in
April, 1996.
> From owner-ipng Thu Apr 25 12:22:25 1996
> To: "vivek (v.) kapil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: (IPng 1631) Re: Adult/minor flag in the IPv6
Just before the afternoon break, one of the conference center staff was
wheeling a cart out towards the food area and was carrying a walkie-talkie.
The voice on the other end was saying, "Hope you can get through, JD: they're
gonna jump on you."
Scott Bradner wrote:
>
> > directing a beam of invisible light produced by a hand-held laser
>
> this is exercise for cats that can see "invisible light"
Which, as any cat owner can attest, covers most of them (and, yes, I know:
"cat owner" is an oxymoron).
19 matches
Mail list logo
