Re: [v6ops] Last Call: (IPv6 in 3GPP Evolved Packet System) to Informational RFC

2011-08-04 Thread GangChen
Hello Authors, I think it is worth adding some texts to describe mobile CPE case, in which CPEs with wireless modem use 3GPP access as uplink. Gang 2011/8/2, The IESG : > > The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Operations WG (v6ops) to > consider the following document: > - 'IPv6 in 3GP

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: (IPv6 in 3GPP Evolved Packet System) to Informational RFC

2011-08-09 Thread GangChen
pected to behave from the > 3GPP system point of view, unless there is a new functional requirement from > 3GPP. > > - Jouni > > > > On Aug 5, 2011, at 5:55 AM, GangChen wrote: > >> Hello Authors, >> >> I think it is worth adding some texts to describe mo

Re: [BEHAVE] Last Call: (Dual Stack Hosts Using "Bump-in-the-Host" (BIH)) to Proposed Standard

2011-09-29 Thread GangChen
Hello Dan, > Can you run an FTP server on the BIH host, and have it do active mode > transfers and passive mode transfers? Could you elaborate the scenario? You assume BIH host taking FTP sever. I'm not sure whether following scenarios are correct There are two possibilities Option 1: +---

Re: [BEHAVE] Last Call: (Dual Stack Hosts Using "Bump-in-the-Host" (BIH)) to Proposed Standard

2011-09-30 Thread GangChen
>> >> Option 1: >> >> +---+ >> |BIH(FTP sever) |--NAT64---FTP Client >> +---+ >> >> >> Option 2: >> >> +---+ >> |BIH(FTP sever) |--FTP Client >> +---+ >> >> In the case of Option 1, it can't work since NAT64 couldn't support >>