Re: [v6ops] Last Call: (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC

uments were not properly taken into account in the WG (read: > ignored), I think it's important that the community see them before we > publish this document. +1 Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG

Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?

Hi, On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:20:18AM -0400, Noel Chiappa wrote: > Apple has enough market share to get away with that. IPv6 doesn't. Just how much market share has 6to4, if we exclude those two users? It's amazing how many human life cycles got wasted on this (and that I can't refuse to be suc

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic

they need to do to keep the networks running in a world without enough IPv4 addresses). Gert Doering -- Operator -- did you enable IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AGVorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundn

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC

ffects paying customers. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- did you enable IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AGVorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC

Hi, On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 11:05:29AM -0400, Keith Moore wrote: > The best way to not rat-hole is just to drop the proposed action. One voice doesn't make it "consensus to drop". Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- did you enable IPv6 on something toda

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC

Hi, On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 04:20:44PM -0700, james woodyatt wrote: > Publish it. Publish it now. Let its authors be free to pursue more useful > ends than defending it. Well said. +1 Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- did you enable IPv6 on something today...? Space

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC

o a) put up relays everywhere and b) ensure that these relays are working, 6to4 as a general mechanism for attachment to the IPv6 Internet is FAIL. If someone wants to use 6to4 to interconnect his machines over an IPv4 infrastructure (=6to4 on both ends), nobody is taking this away. Gert Doering

Re: [v6ops] Review of: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03 *(formal for apps area)*

; and people seem to clearly understand what this is about. "You are on my white list of people that I like talking to!". Gert Doering -- Operator -- did you enable IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AGVorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen

Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?

C might have some say for ARIN, but the rest of the world couldn't care less - and I'm sure that the DoC is well aware of this and won't try to break apart working structures. So this is all sort of academic. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smalle

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]

d-in-hand - that is, IETF makes standards that people can work with, and RIRs use allocation policies that somewhat reflect what the protocol designers had in mind. For IPv6, this isn't a huge success story yet... Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than regist

Re: Stepping down as IETF chair in March - & - RE: A personal take on WG's priorities..

time than 52 months, if we start doing > stuff now to increase the usage efficiencies Do we really *want* that? I'd rather go for "legacy-free networks". Ditch v4, build proper v6 networks. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than

Re: [ipv6-wg@ripe.net] RE: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security

. That way people will > know that they will see more specifics from that prefix and that > they should be accepting it too. As you cite my page, you will also know that it does not make a specific recommendation on the subject of "filtering things between /35 and /48"