Comments on Section 1.2 of draft-ietf-eap-keying-18.txt

I apologize for the tardiness of these comments: I planned to send this email over a week ago but I experienced some computer issues ;-). The definitions of both "authenticator" and "peer" refer to these as 'end of the link'; this seems just a bit too vague to me (after all, what's at the "end of

RE: Excellent choice for summer meeting location!

Bill Strahm <> supposedly scribbled: > I don't know how airline pricing works in .au - but here in the .us > it seems that adding a short flight into a more regional airport can > more than double the cost of an airplane ticket. > > Also note that a town of 100,000 will seldom have conference s

RE: Excellent choice for summer meeting location!

the 63rd IETF August 2005 meeting, is >> paying for the rental of the venue and provides the network. >> Therefore, on behalf of France Telecom, I would like to insure the >> community that we are doing our best to make this meeting the most >> effective, efficient a

RE: Excellent choice for summer meeting location!

, and I will post the > messages. > > Please let me know your remarks. > > Hidega > > -Message d'origine- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part > de Glen Zorn (gwz) Envoyé : vendredi 31 décembre 2004 07:06 À : > ietf@iet

RE: Excellent choice for summer meeting location!

Bruce Lilly <> supposedly scribbled: >> Date: 2005-01-01 21:20 >> From: "Glen Zorn \(gwz\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Yes, I did (though I admit I see little humor is the story). >> However, my main point was not so much that we would die i

RE: Excellent choice for summer meeting location!

Iljitsch van Beijnum <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> supposedly scribbled: > On 2-jan-05, at 3:20, Glen Zorn ((gwz)) wrote: > >>> Of course, the MAXIMUM temperatures quoted in the *exceptional* >>> Paris summer of 2003 were 104 degrees Fahrenheit; > >> 2003

RE: Excellent choice for summer meeting location!

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <> supposedly scribbled: > --On 30. desember 2004 22:05 -0800 "Glen Zorn (gwz)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Paris in August: >> http://www.usatoday.com/weather/news/2003-09-25-france-heat_x.htm > > at first I jus

RE: Excellent choice for summer meeting location!

Paul Vixie <> supposedly scribbled: > this must be a long holiday weekend or something. Apparently only in the rest of the world. > >> The hotel absolutely sucks, thanks, so much so that I, for one, have >> sworn _never_ to stay there again. > > and we will all, of course, miss you very much.

RE: Excellent choice for summer meeting location!

Paul Vixie <> supposedly scribbled: >> It's a start at balancing out all the Minneapolis-in-winter meetings >> we have had. > > the part of mrose's "little black book" that made me laugh out loud > was the description of MFLD (Many Fine Lunches and Dinners). > minneapolis has a good airport, goo

RE: Excellent choice for summer meeting location!

Paul Hoffman / VPNC supposedly scribbled: > It's a start at balancing out all the Minneapolis-in-winter meetings > we have had. Interesting. I would have thought that to balance "unpleasant", one would choose "pleasant" (or at least "tolerable"), but not "hideous" or

Excellent choice for summer meeting location!

Paris in August: http://www.usatoday.com/weather/news/2003-09-25-france-heat_x.htm ~gwz ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

RE: draft-farrel-rtg-morality-requirements-00.txt

Ole Jacobsen <> wrote: > Indeed. > > People polled after the election said they put Moral Values as the #1 > priorty. Just one question: when did minding your own business cease to be a "moral value"? > I see no reason why the previous and next administration > won't make a morality section a

RE: FW: [Inquiry #19085] Issue with Meeting Schedule change at thelast moment

Stephane Maes <> wrote: > Brian, > > This expectation is exactly what is inappropriate if IETF wants to > attract pointed experts in a subject to contribute to a specific > activity. OK, so the original complaint seems to have been that the IETF was violating its process or otherwise doing somet

RE: [Inquiry #19085] Issue with Meeting Schedule change at the lastmoment

Stephane Maes <> wrote: > Carsten, > > I think that being deprived of the possibility to debate in the high > bandwidth forum provided the FTF some issues that would better > address these issues qualifies as being disfranchised... Nobody is depriving you of anything, you are being inconvenienc

RE: Stepping down as IETF chair in March - & - RE: A personal take on WG's priorities..

Fred Baker <> wrote: > Guys - please... > > maybe it's just me, but it seems like this thread should be something > about Harald. Coopting it to the continued wars between various > competing technology religions seems just a tad disrespectful. > > Could you at least change the subject line if