On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Phil Hallam-Baker just suggested in the plenary that we could
> easily raise funds by going round looking for sponsorship
> from industry, $10k and $10k there.
>
> This ignores that this is *exactly* where ISOC's funds come
> from, and those funds ar
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Kevin C. Almeroth wrote:
> But the result is independent of whether people are running in ad hoc
> mode... it has to do with AP tuning, etc.
I just noticed that where I'm sitting in the lobby, one can pick up 2
networks: ietf58 and hhonors.
Neither one charges for SSH tunne
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Jim Martin wrote:
>
> I strongly encourage people to consider bringing 802.11a cards to
> future meetings! (Note: Of course, now that I've said that, the future
> hosts will decide against deploying it)
If we go for 802.11a, I sugggest that we ask a vendor (or two) to
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
> does anyone know how one can get from San Diego downtown to the
> conference hotel without renting a car? Are there public transports?
If you fly in and stay at conference hotel, then you can take the hotel
shuttle at the airport. 5 minutes. Probably
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On Thursday, September 2, 2004, at 06:04 AM, George Michaelson wrote:
> > I call again for meetings run over the weekend. midweek to midweek.
>
> While I'd certainly prefer to travel midweek, there are a couple
> of problems with running midweek to midwee
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On Thursday, September 2, 2004, at 09:48 AM, Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC)
> wrote:
> > The same applies to Sunday and Friday but this hasn't caused any
> > problem
> > so-far. Why would Saturday be different?
>
> "
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> At 11:40 04/12/2000 +0900, Lee, Jiwoong wrote:
> >Neophyte speaker question:
> >
> >Is a piece of 2HD disk enough to give a presentation at 49th IETF meeting?
> >Then, when shall I 'put' it into a laptop?
>
> recent meetings, the secretariat (or the
On Thu, 14 Dec 100, Johnny Eriksson wrote:
> Pete Resnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 12/13/00 at 1:30 PM -0800, Lane Patterson wrote:
> >
> > >Would the IETF organizers consider requesting WG/BOF attendance
> > >plans upon registration?
> >
> > They do ask when the meeting is schedul
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Matt Holdrege wrote:
> At 08:07 AM 12/19/2000, Frank Kastenholz wrote:
> >At 09:28 AM 12/19/00 -0500, RJ Atkinson wrote:
> > >We can also end the de facto practice of
> > >using the sessions as tutorials and discontinue fancy prepared
> > >presentations of the material alread
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Scott Brim wrote:
> On 20 Dec 2000 at 23:53 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] apparently wrote:
> > I assume that by "Presentations", you mean "tutorial presentations",
> > and not "Gee George, your proposal on the mailing list looks novel
> > and interesting, but we're not getting it
Can we please agree that there is no perfect place to hold the IETF and
stop this discussion?
Henk
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> At/À 11:14 2001-03-20 -0500, John Day you wrote/vous écriviez:
>
>
> >>The electronic outdoor temperature sign in the skyway reading
> >>"39". The u
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Susan Harris wrote:
> > Easy - don't go to events where you don't want people to know.
> > The names are available. If you don't want your name on the
> > list of attendees - don't attend. I doubt they copied the
> > entire list. What horrible thing do you think they were
> >
> (at least for US-homed travellers)
Can we please keep in mind that half the attendees are not from the US?
My current IETF schedule is something like:
* Fly on Saturday (10-15 hours, 6-9 hour time change),
* Relatively quiet Sunday to recover,
* Meetings Monday-Friday morning,
* Catch a
Dinara,
> We are not going to schedule anything on Friday. Scheduling is closed
> already and even if we have a very very last minute request we'll
> schedule it some day from Monday to Thursday that meeting week. So you
> can schedule your flights without any worry. No Meetings on Friday.
Is th
On Tue, 28 May 2002, Melinda Shore wrote:
> At 02:58 PM 5/28/02 -0500, Pete Resnick wrote:
> >Again, I'm not going to object to using meeting time for this kind of
> >session if that's what's needed. But other than Harald's message, I
> >have not heard anything about this since Minneapolis and ha
15 matches
Mail list logo
