lör 2012-02-25 klockan 19:23 +0100 skrev Julian Reschke:
> Well, I'm one of the editors of the authentication framework spec, so if
> there's something wrong with it, I'd like to know.
Only the thing said earluer
- Define how servers may influence the visible appearance of the login
action
- Pe
lör 2012-02-25 klockan 17:44 + skrev Stephen Farrell:
> I don't think fixing or changing the framework will give us better
> auth schemes by itself. (Better auth schemes may or may not require
> changes to the framework, I dunno.)
Obviously not. Fixing the framework giving better use of auth
lör 2012-02-25 klockan 14:13 + skrev Stephen Farrell:
> I don't agree with you there - the perceived low probability that
> something will be deployed is a real disincentive here. We have had
> people wanting to do work on this and have been told there's no point
> because it won't get adopted
tis 2012-02-21 klockan 19:50 +0100 skrev Julian Reschke:
> Well, we have an existing authentication framework. It would be
> interesting to find out what's missing from it.
My take is better secure authentication schemes (not plaintext password
based) which is cleanly specified to a level that im
