Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> ALL my IETF mailing lists come to email accounts that I control on my own
> mail server. but
>
> I recently submitted my first Internet Draft since my company was bought by
> a BIG TELCO, and it has BIG email filtering rules. In large part these
> rules were develop
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 15:10, Doug Ewell wrote:
> A former employer of mine once blocked a message which contained the phrase
> "magna cxm laude," where the X was a U. Apparently that one word, taken out
> of context, was sufficient.
That's clbuttic. A group I belong to, once had a convention
Randy Presuhn wrote:
> It's about time we got rid of that pesky J and W, and we don't
> *really *need both V and U, do uue?
Cue Mark Twain and his orxografikl riform...
-Dave
--
Dave Aronson - Have Pun, Will Babble | Work: davearonson.com | /\ ASCII
-+ Play
On Mon, Dec XIV, MMIX at XX:X, Loa Andersson wrote:
> great idea - and we should als adopt Latin numbers!
...
> Loa Andersson
>
> Sr Strategy and Standards Manager
> Ericsson ///
> phone: +46 10 717 52 13
> +46 767 72 92 13
Shouldn't you therefore have written:
phone: +XLVI X DC
Jari Arkko wrote:
> What should we do about this block? Some of the potential answers include
> documenting its role, marking it as reserved but deprecating its use in
> examples, and returning it to the free pool immediately (with a warning sign
> about possible filtering problems).
If we can ar
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> By definition, if the IETF directed IANA to reserve it, it's not a Arin
> prefix.
D'oh, sorry, I mean IANA. That's what I get for typing in a hurry,
juggling too many ETLAs
-Dave, putting on dunce cap and sitting in corner
--
Dave Aronson, software engineer or tr
David Harrington wrote:
> As part of declaring IPv6 a full standard, would we also declare IPv4
> obsolete or Historic?
Given IPv6's rate of adoption so far, how soon do you think IPv4 will
*really* be in so little use as to be obsolete or historic? With the
growth rate of the Internet and home
David Kessens wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:36:53AM -0400, IETF Member Dave Aronson wrote:
...
>> I'd be willing to bet that the number of IPv4
>> installations is *growing* per year, not shrinking, and that that
>> trend will continue for at least the next
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 16 sep 2009, at 18:40, IETF Member Dave Aronson wrote:
...
> What's the point of running IPv4 when you can do everything you need to do
> over IPv6? (Note that it works the other way around, also...)
Inertia. Lots of people are already running IPv
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
> Is a dual stack IPv4-IPv6 likely to be more unstable than pure IPv4 or pure
> IPv6?
Just from a pure software-engineering standpoint, with no reference to
the stability of current stacks nor the exact tasks at hand, it seems
quite likely. More code, doing more
The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the following document:
>
> - 'PATCH Method for HTTP '
> as a Proposed Standard
This could be sort of a nitpick, but
It seems to me that this could be used for both simple sequences of
bytes, and
Pars Mutaf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On 9/26/07, John L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > approaches that depend on something like a CAPTCHA to
> > work don't have much of a long term future.
>
> I respect your opinion but it says that one day we won't be able to tell
> humans and
Virendra Gandhi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> This is the classic John Smith problem,
As an interesting (at least to me) side note: The most common *given* name in
the world is Mohammed. The most common *family* name in the world is Chang.
This does *not* mean that Mohammed Chang is a
Frank Ellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Join the club of users despising their MUA...
The dictum of Three Dead Trolls in a Baggie, re operating systems,
applies equally well to nearly every sort of application.
-Dave
--
Dave Aronson
"Specialization is for insects." -Heinlein
Work: http://
Jim Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps someone should tell the DoD that WW2 has ended. :-)
Might work. After all, the feds finally realized we didn't need to
fund the Spanish-American War any more
-Dave
--
Dave Aronson
"Specialization is for insects." -Heinlein
Work: http://www.da
Michael Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> If there is interest, I will make a list. If someone has a more PC
> name, I'll use it.
As we all know, the absolutely most critically important thing about any
project, and a mailing list should be no exception, is its name. It should be
Adrian Farrel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> "Stephen Casner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
...
> > I am currently reading a boot...
>
> Yes, this has to be a new and innovative communication method :-)
Not really; the concept of printing certain instructions on the heel has been
aroun
Joe Abley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
(or is that Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ably writes?):
> > Perhaps requesting volunteers to help would reduce the work load?
>
> The IAB did that. I *am* the volunteer :-)
Help the volunteer! Help the volunteer!
;-)
___
18 matches
Mail list logo
