> I thought (IIRC, and maybe I'm spacing) the whole reason for
> allocating this space was that 1918 space _couldn't_ easily be used for
CGN
> because there were too many conflicting usages. So, now we're making
more 1918
> space? This is a good idea... how? If we need more 1918 space, let's do
I'd like to thank Owen for explaning his point of view with such clarity
and I'd like to concur with him by rephrasing in my own words (most of
this has already been said by others thought).
Taking the objections in order, again:
1. Allocation of a special-use /10 does not hasten the deployme
