Lemon [mailto:ted.le...@nominum.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:57 PM
To: Joel Halpern Direct
Cc: Black, David; Joel M. Halpern; McPherson, Danny;
s...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; gen-...@ietf.org; Jean-Michel
Combes; Joel Halpern
Subject: Re: [savi] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-savi
]
Received: Tuesday, 26 Mar 2013, 7:45pm
To: Ted Lemon [ted.le...@nominum.com]
CC: McPherson, Danny [dmcpher...@verisign.com]; Fred Baker [f...@cisco.com];
Joel Halpern [joel.halp...@ericsson.com]; gen-...@ietf.org [gen-...@ietf.org];
Jean-Michel Combes [jeanmichel.com...@gmail.com]; s...@ietf.org
[s
Then it will be done. I will wait for the AD to decide what other
changes are needed, and then will either make this change or include it
in an RFC Editor note.
Thank you,
Joel
On 3/27/2013 12:42 PM, Black, David wrote:
That would do nicely.
Thanks,
--David
-Original Message-
Most of what you describe Sander sounds reasonable, and sounds aligned
with what is i the deployment documents.
The WG debated the EID allocation extensively. One could argue that
there is no need for it, that we could merely request that PI
allocations be granted for LISP EID usage
Joe,
THE KARP WG Chairs have reviewed your comments, in order to figure
out what the best way to address them. We would appreciate it if you
could engage in discussion of this proposal on the KARP working group
email list. If you feel we are still not understanding your point, we
would
