On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Richard L. Barnes rbar...@bbn.com wrote:
I personally think the masking thing is pretty ugly. But I
have to (reluctantly) admit I think it does what its
supposed to do. At this stage I think it comes down to
either doing the masking or not using port 80.
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
Adding a SRV lookup should add 0ms if it isn't there as you should be
making A, and SRV lookups in parallel. Non-existance is as
cachable as existance is.
But you have to wait until the SRV returns even if the A/
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo i...@aliax.net wrote:
2011/7/22 David Endicott dendic...@gmail.com:
The technological advantages are worthy, when it's used, but when it
doesn't
come into play, there are added inefficiencies.
~100 ms (if the DNS server is not local and
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:24 PM, David Endicott dendic...@gmail.com wrote:
I find myself reminded of my reservations about HTTP Upgrade as the opening
handshake. It is clever, efficient and reflects some of the shared nature
between HTTP and WS. However, I felt it should be considered one
