My resignation

2009-04-18 Thread LB
to help us, the users and the people. Xavier Legoff ___ listegenerale mailing list listegener...@franceatlarge.org http://franceatlarge.org/mailman/listinfo/listegenerale_franceatlarge.org -- LB ___ Ietf

An Internet for the Rich

2008-07-05 Thread LB
and cultures. The IETF does not even consider is architectural solutions could help democracy resist moneycracy. -- LB RFC 3271: Internet is for everyone - but it won't be if it isn't affordable by all that wish to partake of its services, so we must dedicate ourselves to making the Internet

Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

2008-06-17 Thread LB
to worry about the Internet and its users, rather than about internal disputes and the IESG? The appeal would then simply concern the review of the three lines defining the DISCUSS decision point in the IESG page. My idea is it so stupid? -- LB ___ IETF

Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action.

2008-03-25 Thread LB
to protect many's culture, language, occupation, family was already too much for our competitors (who came together to sign the PR-action against him). Now one does certainly not all those he represented! Is that correct IETF? -- LB ___ IETF mailing list

Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action

2008-03-24 Thread LB
and political pressure, -- If we or our texts are subject to exclusion for reasons not technically documented this will be visible to all. -- LB 2008/3/22, LB [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Dear Russ, I am not sure what should be the next step and I wish that all is clear and transparent in the management of what I

Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action

2008-03-22 Thread LB
the cases where the identity of somebody has been challenged within the IETF in such manner and what procedures have been initiated. With my thanks and my best regards -- LB 2008/3/21, Russ Housley [EMAIL PROTECTED]: LB: Randy has responded quite publicly. I think his position is quite clear. So

Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action

2008-03-20 Thread LB
it with the support of our two direct commercial competitors in his WG. Under these conditions you will understand that I am not to be giving anything that enables them to validate a practice of arbitrary exclusion of the IETF. Today I, whom tomorrow? -- LB

Re: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn)

2008-03-04 Thread LB
, IAB, IRTF, ITU, IGF / WSIS, MINC, ISO, ICC, UNESCO, ALAC. Respectfully. LB ___ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf