Francis,
Ok, It shouldn't be a negotiation but an indication to accommodate
communication to each party.
Fair point.
Ok, it is important to note the peer is limiting max frame
size not the
message size which may be still infinite in practical terms (63
bits)and we have fragmentation
Francis,
I agree with your points and would welcome a max frame size negotiation
header.
However, whilst an intermediary might legitimately change the fragmentation
of a frame it cannot merge complete messages. If, in your example, your
client limited itself to messages of a certain size then it
I agree that this would be very useful.
Would this be one frame size for both directions, or could it be specified
in each direction?
I'm a little wary of intermediaries being allowed to adjust this unless
they're only allowed to reduce the amount...
Len
www.lenholgate.com
-Original
Would this be one frame size for both directions, or could
it be specified
in each direction?
It should be done in both directions, assuming each party may have
different requirements..
That was my feeling on it.
I'm a little wary of intermediaries being allowed to adjust
this
