On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Dean Willis wrote:
This is bigger than the perpass list.
I suggested that the surveillance/broken crypto challenge represents damage to the
Internet. I'm not the only one thinking that way.
an additional call to action can be found here:
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Wes Beebee (wbeebee) wrote:
If the date is special then thoes RFCs SHOULD be *historical*.
I thought they should be classified as hysterical.
there is an echo (echo) ((echo) ) in here (here) ((here))
- Wes
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 6/4/2012 12:36 AM, SM wrote:
At 14:33 01-06-2012, Russ Housley wrote:
So, I am left with a few questions:
- What is the similar forcing function if we use a wiki?
- Will the number of people that can make updates eliminate the need
for such a
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Bob Braden wrote:
1986 Internet Activities Board
1992 Internet Architecture Board
I think this is incorrect. The earliest IAB was created by the ARPA program
manager Vint Cert in 1981. (In fact, I probably have some scribbled notes
from the first IAB
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
Hi, Dave,
Anything that the IETF can do, to make the IAB and IETF Chair positions
less of
a full-time (or more) job, is a good thing.
Anything? I believe you do not believe that statement, but I think it
accurately summarizes the focus of this
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, John C Klensin wrote:
snip
At the risk of agreeing violently with Dave, I think the series
of comments above, and referenced above, are missing something.
None of this familiy of delegation or someone else proposals
requires that the IAB or IESG Chairs not serve on the
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Dave CROCKER wrote:
On 4/14/2011 9:51 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
My concern is that this proposed change would likely make the IAOC work
worse. That is, I think it would have a negative impact on the operations
of
the IETF and that is why I am concerned.
Bob,
That is
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
As far as I know, what you're looking for doesn't exist, although it would
probably be good if it did!
One thing that does crop up here and there are hitchhiker's guide RFCs, such
as this one:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5411
Beyond that, the
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, IETF Chair wrote:
You have probably already heard the news, but just to make sure no one
is left out of the loop, I am posting this note.
snip
To the universal deployment of IPv6,
Hear Hear. It seems a bit odd to down a shot of single malt at 11:56am PST
but it *is*
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
I just realized something ...
Note that I'm not saying that volunteer NOC is not good, but, if they are
waived from the registration fee ... Why IESG members not ?
Jordi -
With respect, this is a more subtle problem set then you're
seeing.
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Paul Hoffman wrote:
http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/2731
Those of you with a good collection of old IETF t-shirts (and other
schwag; did anyone keep the phone cards MCI gave us at IETF 34?) might
consider having them archived by Jason.
I always get a small jolt
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Samuel Weiler wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, David Morris wrote:
If you care about hotel pricing, there is no excuse for complaining
about IETF rates in a location like Anaheim with dozens of alternatives
within walking distance.
So far, I haven't complained (at least not
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
If you brought small hand drums to IETF 77, please join me for a few minutes
before each plenary (in many cultures, drumming is part of a tradition of
healing :-)
If you did not - I brought about four small frame drums/headed tamborines and
will
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
I would like to hear a bit more background about these activities, see
https://www.projectliberty.org/news_events/press_releases/internet_society_j
oins_liberty_alliance_management_board
Hannes -
ISOC hat on
As stated in the press release, ISOC
snip
So I do not think IETF should be the slightest worried ISOC is doing
something here without coordination. And without visibility to the IETF.
And the more people in IETF is interested on this more meta-level-work
than bits on the wire, the higher the quality will be of the work ISOC
As I remember it, the flood in the NOC was much more exciting then
the DNSSEC bits.
- Lucy
On Nov 27, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Matthew Ford wrote:
After all the years of FUD surrounding DNSSEC deployment, I feel
quite strongly that having the IETF do as you suggested and then be
able to point
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:34:41PM +0100,
Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 35 lines which said:
What's going on with the preparations to turn off IPv4 at IETF-71?
It's been really quiet surrounding that topic since the
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
I'm looking for a reasonably recent presentation on the state of IP
address allocation that would be suitable for a class I'm teaching.
Henning -
Duane Wessels of The Measurement Factory has created some
great maps of current v4 allocations:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Bob Braden wrote:
Here is my understanding:
1. The shortage of IPv4 addresses will increasingly cripple the
communication effectiveness of the Internet, either directly
or indirectly through ubiqitous NATting.
2. As a replacement for IPv4, IPv6 is the
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 14 nov 2007, at 14:19, RJ Atkinson wrote:
There is an opportunity in all of this mess for some folks
to initiate work to develop a replacement RFC for NAT+PT. As near as
I can tell, operators aren't particularly worried whether that
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Philip Matthews wrote:
The detailed information on streams and times seems to be missing from
http://videolab.uoregon.edu/events/ietf/
All I see is background information.
And the IETF 69 Playlist link seems to be broken.
Joel is in transit, the IETF69 network isn't
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
I mentioned Randy Bush when I was at the plenary mike tonight.
According to ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4264.txt, it's Tim Griffin
and Geoff Huston.
I was at NANOG when Randy presented TIM'S slides -
will keep you informed of the contract negotiations.
Lucy Lynch
IAOC Chair
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
All -
Please see: http://iaoc.ietf.org/
and watch this site for updates. See you in Prague!
- Lucy
_
llynch @civil-tongue.net
llynch on jabber.org
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
derived from the
existing draft and I'll let the draft time out.
Thanks to all who took the time to respond.
- Lucy
_
llynch @civil-tongue.net
llynch on jabber.org
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:39:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Lucy Lynch [EMAIL
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Wednesday, 07 March, 2007 10:54 -0500 Edward Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will attest to Prague being survivable. I have been there
once already and suffered no ill effects and was not robbed.
I.e., don't panic.
Location for location, the
All -
At the behest of the IAOC, I recently published a draft:
Tasks previously assigned to the IETF Executive Director
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lynch-execd-tasks-00.txt
Which was intended to tidy up some issues left over from our
pre-BCP 101 days:
BCP 101 [RFC4071]
because I aspire to be
a charter member of the keep unnecessary administrative clutter out of the
RFC Series club.
Sign me up! Is there a secret handshake? Do I get to wear a fez?
john
--On Friday, February 16, 2007 13:39 -0800 Lucy Lynch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All -
At the behest
. This year, the IAB will select one person for a
term ending in spring 2009.
The incumbent is Lucy Lynch, who was selected by the IAB for an
initial two year term expiring in spring 2007.
For the record - the incumbent is stepping down, which means that
this is your opportunity to step up and be part
have questions, comments, or concerns.
Lucy Lynch
IAOC Chair
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
I think some of Laksminath's concern is valid.
But I think the solution to the problem is simple:
Make it publicly known who is on the technical staff that supports the
Nomcom, and make it clear that these people:
1) May learn Nomcom information
All -
Found a headset in the hallway - identify to claim.
- Lucy
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
have questions, comments, or concerns.
Lucy Lynch
IAOC Chair
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
33 matches
Mail list logo
