RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12

anges (include existing and future defined) defined for TLV Type 1 apply to TLV Type 21. Assignments of sub-..." Best regards, Mach > -Original Message- > From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 5:21 PM > To: Mach Chen; > dr

RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12

Hi Roni, Thanks for your detailed review and comments! Please see my reply inline... > From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 9:06 PM > To: draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping@tools.ietf.org > Cc: ietf@ietf.org; gen-...@ietf.org > Subjec

RE: [mpls] Last Call: (LabelSwitched Path (LSP) Ping for IPv6 Pseudowire FECs) toProposed Standard

Hi Tom, Many thanks for your comments! Please see my reply inline with [Mach] Best regards, Mach From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [ietf-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of t.p. [daedu...@btconnect.com] Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 2:05 To: ietf@ietf.org Subje

RE: [mpls] Last Call: (MPLS On-demand Connectivity Verification and Route Tracing) to Proposed Standard

Hi, One question about the difference of the encapsulation modes between CV and Route Tracing. In Section 3, there are three encapsulation modes for on-demand CV: "LSP-Ping with IP encapsulation", "On-demand CV with IP encapsulation, over ACH" and "Non-IP based On-demand CV, using ACH", but fo