>> Couched in friendlierterms, the discussion might have been:
>>A: I have never seen actual evidence that a problem exists.
>>B: I have.
>>A: Oh, really? Where?
>>B: I don't know. But I've definitely seen it - perhaps if you looked, you
would too.
Of course you are correct, and I apologize f
Let me guess, I have the time to do research for you, that you are unwilling
or unable to do. You say
that something is entirely anecdotal, I say that it isn't. Do the research.
/m.
>>the problem is that, as far as the public knows, all "evidence" about
>>computers interfering with aircraft systems is anecdotal. we have yet to
see
>.a study reported.
In fact, studies of crashes and "incidents" have been linked to early
wireless phones, attempting to
use modems, early laptop
-Original Message-
From: John Stracke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>(The difference, of course, is that there's no Hearing Aid VII, with a
wireless
>>connection to let you listen to Web pages or something...yet. The flight
>.attendants can't keep up with the tech; and better for them to
on 15-June-2000, Valdis writes:
On a related note, I noticed that IETF draft announcements do *NOT* list
a vector pointing to where discussion of the draft should be directed.
Although the author's address is available down in the draft, should there
be a 'Discussion regarding this draft should g
Forgive this spam; I've got a lot of spam in the can and candles left over
from Y2K preparation in my basement. Cases and cases, including the ever
popular 'food' flavored spam. Also, I have two generators and 20,000 boxes
of ammunition. These would make a nice addition to the wooden coffins
a
When the procedures dictate that government agencies get involved at certain
points
and you notify them of the outage or problem, what other steps do you
recommend?
Operational entities are not, in most cases, law enforcement agencies.
There is a limit to
how much notification one should under
