On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 02:46:12PM -0400, Bruce Lilly wrote:
1. Delivery notifications should have the return-path (SMTP envelope sender)
set to a null value to prevent loops.
RFC 3834 says MAY have:
3.3. Message envelope
[ ... ] Since in most cases it is not appropriate to respond to
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 01:34:06PM +0200, jfcm wrote:
Dear Markus,
to know where your remarks may lead, let come back to 1993.
You mean like in
http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/archives/WWW-TALK/www-talk-1993q4.messages/579.html
At 21:16 23/04/04, Markus Stumpf wrote:
Hmmm ...
For instance
Hoi John,
thanks for your comments.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 02:48:41PM -0500, John Leslie wrote:
This proposal depends on the authenticity of the in-addr.arpa
delegations; thus poorly-maintained regions of in-addr.arpa will
necessarily authorize too much or too little. Further discussion
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 06:49:13AM -0600, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
I agree with Dave in the general case (the goal is to go beyond
today's Internet), but am wondering if that also requires us to go
beyond today's language capability when we start leaking these
addresses between enclaves. I am
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:11:20PM +0100, Jean-Jacques Puig wrote:
Agree. Another point is that many firms print contact / support / sales
mail addresses on documents. So may also individuals in some
circumstances (teachers on the hard copy of their teaching doc,
classified advertisements on
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 09:50:06AM -0500, John Stracke wrote:
I think the only times I've seen anybody use PDAs to exchange contact
information were at IETF meetings, in the hallways, when people had time
to kill. It just takes too long. Typically, when two companies are
meeting, and
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 07:20:25PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
Perhaps all that is important is to remember that properly configured
Reverse DNS includes having no reverse DNS at all.
Reverse DNS is just a zone in the in-addr.arpa domain. And there is more
to reverse DNS than just a
