On Dec 4, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Sudhanva Mudigere Narayana Gowda wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a query regarding sctp multihoming behavior.
>
> I have setup a multihomed association and this is my observation
>
> Host_A (IP a): Local single Homed endpoint
>
> Host_B (IP b(Primary), IP c(secondary)): Re
Hi Samuel,
you might want to send this message to sigt...@ietf.org.
Best regards
Michael
On Apr 4, 2009, at 1:07 AM, JEYASEELAN Samuel Durairaj wrote:
Hi,
When the CLDT is sent from the SG to ASP, what is the value of the
Address Indicator ?
1.SG receives a SCCP message with
cdpa_ri=RT
Does others also have a problem in reserving a room
at the Clarion Sign? I get only a generic error message
the the system can not process the reservation and
I should check my data...
Best regards
Michael
On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 14 apr 2009, at 16:37, IETF
Hi,
you can send the INIT to any of the addresses of the peer.
The notion of primary/secondary is only relevant to the
data transmission.
Please send further questions regarding to ts...@ietf.org.
Best regards
Michael
On May 25, 2009, at 11:51 AM, > wrote:
Hello!
As wrote in RFC2960(4960)
On May 29, 2009, at 12:23 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
David Conrad wrote:
However, pragmatically speaking, I suspect it is going to be much,
much easier to get DNSSEC deployed than it would be to get every
router/firewall/NAT manufacturer and network operator to support/
deploy SCTP, not t
Dear all,
I also support the publication of the ID as a standards track ID.
The mechanism described in the document is important and also
used, for example, in DTLS/SCTP.
Best regards
Michael
On Jul 30, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Stephen Kent wrote:
I too support publication of this document as a Stand
Hi Spencer,
see my comments in-line.
Best regards
Michael
On Apr 17, 2008, at 12:51 AM, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.ht
Hi Elwyn,
see my comments in-line.
Best regards
Michael
On Apr 11, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote:
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> _http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html_).
Hi Rubin,
Can you provide the documents in a readable format? Did you look at
SIGTRAN protocols?
You might want to send an e-mail also to the SIGTRAN mailing list...
Best regards
Michael
On Aug 13, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Rubin Rose wrote:
Dear members,
I was inspired to submit content in order t
On Mar 11, 2011, at 7:44 AM, Will Yu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a query on SCTP standard (RFC 4960). In section 8.2 Path Failure
> Detection, it describes the action which end points should take in detecting
> path unavailable.
>
>When its peer endpoint is multi-homed, an endpoint should
r, you should be able to handle a network setup, where no cross routing
is possible,
so there is only connectivity between IP1 <-> IP3 and IP2 <-> IP4. This is a
setup which
is often used in SIGTRAN setups.
Best regards
Michael
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Brs,
> Will Yu
&g
11 matches
Mail list logo