Re: sctp multihoming query

On Dec 4, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Sudhanva Mudigere Narayana Gowda wrote: > Hi, > I have a query regarding sctp multihoming behavior. > > I have setup a multihomed association and this is my observation > > Host_A (IP a): Local single Homed endpoint > > Host_B (IP b(Primary), IP c(secondary)): Re

Re: Address Indicator - SUA rfc 3868

Hi Samuel, you might want to send this message to sigt...@ietf.org. Best regards Michael On Apr 4, 2009, at 1:07 AM, JEYASEELAN Samuel Durairaj wrote: Hi, When the CLDT is sent from the SG to ASP, what is the value of the Address Indicator ? 1.SG receives a SCCP message with cdpa_ri=RT

Re: 75th IETF - Hotels

Does others also have a problem in reserving a room at the Clarion Sign? I get only a generic error message the the system can not process the reservation and I should check my data... Best regards Michael On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: On 14 apr 2009, at 16:37, IETF

Re: SCTP multihoming and INIT

Hi, you can send the INIT to any of the addresses of the peer. The notion of primary/secondary is only relevant to the data transmission. Please send further questions regarding to ts...@ietf.org. Best regards Michael On May 25, 2009, at 11:51 AM, > wrote: Hello! As wrote in RFC2960(4960)

Re: DNS over SCTP

On May 29, 2009, at 12:23 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: David Conrad wrote: However, pragmatically speaking, I suspect it is going to be much, much easier to get DNSSEC deployed than it would be to get every router/firewall/NAT manufacturer and network operator to support/ deploy SCTP, not t

Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-extractor (Keying Material Exporters for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard

Dear all, I also support the publication of the ID as a standards track ID. The mechanism described in the document is important and also used, for example, in DTLS/SCTP. Best regards Michael On Jul 30, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Stephen Kent wrote: I too support publication of this document as a Stand

Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-rserpool-asap-19.txt

Hi Spencer, see my comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Apr 17, 2008, at 12:51 AM, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.ht

Re: gen-art review of draft-ietf-rserpool-policies-08.txt

Hi Elwyn, see my comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Apr 11, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote: > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > _http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html_).

Re: lateral approach to SS7/VoIP over satellite

Hi Rubin, Can you provide the documents in a readable format? Did you look at SIGTRAN protocols? You might want to send an e-mail also to the SIGTRAN mailing list... Best regards Michael On Aug 13, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Rubin Rose wrote: Dear members, I was inspired to submit content in order t

Re: SCTP Path Max Retransmission Query

On Mar 11, 2011, at 7:44 AM, Will Yu wrote: > Hello, > > I have a query on SCTP standard (RFC 4960). In section 8.2 Path Failure > Detection, it describes the action which end points should take in detecting > path unavailable. > >When its peer endpoint is multi-homed, an endpoint should

Re: SCTP Path Max Retransmission Query

r, you should be able to handle a network setup, where no cross routing is possible, so there is only connectivity between IP1 <-> IP3 and IP2 <-> IP4. This is a setup which is often used in SIGTRAN setups. Best regards Michael > > Thanks again. > > Brs, > Will Yu &g