Great. I had forgotten to mention that I had created tracker #174 for
this issue. I will mark this one resolved.
PatC
-Original Message-
From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 6:42 PM
To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
Thanks for your review, Joel. Please see my comments below.
Question:
The document (in section 2.5) calls for specific DSCP values (46
and
34) to be used on management frames. Two questions:
Is this the decimal value of the 6 bit DSCP field, or the decimal value
of the 8 bit ToS field
Hi Pasi,
Finally over your comments on the base protocol, and just getting around
to the binding spec. I will only create issues where needed, and
therefore indicated below. Otherwise I will simply address them in this
e-mail.
> I was under the impression that 802 (or at least 802.11) required
Hi Pasi,
Finally over your comments on the base protocol, and just getting around
to the binding spec. I will only create issues where needed, and
therefore indicated below. Otherwise I will simply address them in this
e-mail.
> I was under the impression that 802 (or at least 802.11) required
Thanks for the review, Pasi.
We use tracker to keep track of all of our issues. My plan is to create
a unique tracker entry for all of the substantial issues you raised
here, and a single one for the minor claritifications/nits you include
below. Please see below for information on the issues I cr
