perceptions and ideas are, much less to say what is wrong with
them and thus replace them with correct perceptions and ideas.
Yours sincerely,
Robert Honore.
Masataka Ohta wrote:
Robert Honore;
I would also prefer not to modify any of the
libraries or implementations of those protocols, lest we
into a framework that is yet to be specified. I
believe specification of that framework begins with our defining what an
end-point is.
Yours sincerely,
Robert Honore.
that
report that the additional complexity did come from the attempt to
provide the kind of resilience we are seeking, or from the rather
ambitious goals of project SNIPE. I will re-read more slowly and
carefully this time.
Yours sincerely,
Robert Honore.
Keith Moore wrote:
(regarding
do want my
application processess to be able to adapt or recover when something
happens that affects its communication with a peer *process* while
neither of the cooperating processes has indicated any intention to stop
participating in that communication.
Yours sincerely,
Robert Honore.
and state
information than the transport layer.
Does Mr. Moore care to explain a little why he believes these two
statements? As far as I can tell it needs not necessarily be so.
Yours sincerely,
Robert Honore.
Tony Hain wrote:
In the ongoing saga about topology reality vs. application perception
