is: is it that IETF participation is such
that for the host it may be hard to feel comfortable ensuring such things? If
an incident like that occurs can it be considered as an individual issue or do
we expect many participants will be involved?
Thanks
Stephane
_____
Stephane H. Maes, PhD,
C
I was trying not to comment on this thread but frankly, I think it is important
to offer a different perspective regarding the prioritization to consider.
I am not judging adequacy of a particular location. I am sure other locations
may pose problems. I do understand the frustration felt with
It may be an artifact of email or I may have missed some earlier relevant
exchanges, but I am a bit surprised that it is announced for the first time ~
10 minutes before the event... Of course some of us can't attend in such
cases...
Stephane
-Original Message-
From: IETF Chair [mail
Brian,
Possibly.
But when putting all under consideration even from that point of view, travel
(time and cost) is only one factor. Cost of facilities, facilities it self,
quality of service, cost for participants on site etc is also important and
often way lower in some of the locations not
Add Singapore, Thailand, Australia, New Zealand, ...
Stephane
-Original Message-
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 3:00 AM
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Meetings in other regions
Definitively there are several countries: Spain, Mexic
I definitively support the view that IETF should reach larger audiences of
participants and therefore target regions in a balanced manner not based on the
% of participants. Many do not participate because their travel challenges are
almost never addressed by IETF. These statistics are skewed
Harald,
Thanks for taking the time to look at this.
Hopefully this can be better handled in the future. I would encourage
formalizing better some deadlines for the agenda and finalizing it in terms of
the slots.
Thanks
Stephane
_
Stephane H. Maes, PhD,
Director of Architecture - Mobile
s the one that de facto prevails.
Thanks
Stephane
_
Stephane H. Maes, PhD,
Director of Architecture - Mobile, Oracle Corporation.
Ph: +1-203-300-7786 (mobile/SMS); Fax: +1-650-506-7222; Office UM:
+1-650-607-6296.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IM: shmaes (AIM) or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN Mess
_
Stephane H. Maes, PhD,
Director of Architecture - Mobile, Oracle Corporation.
Ph: +1-203-300-7786 (mobile/SMS); Fax: +1-650-506-7222; Office UM: +1-650-607-6296.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IM: shmaes (AIM) or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN Messenger)
-Original Message-
From: Stephane H
_
Stephane H. Maes, PhD,
Director of Architecture - Mobile, Oracle Corporation.
Ph: +1-203-300-7786 (mobile/SMS); Fax: +1-650-506-7222; Office UM: +1-650-607-6296.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IM: shmaes (AIM) or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN Messenger)
-Original Message-
From: Stephane H
10 matches
Mail list logo
