On Feb 20, 2013, at 9:46 PM, Carlos M. martinez carlosm3...@gmail.com wrote:
Wasn't the 'evil bit' able to hold the value 2 ?
Yes, but we need an RFC for that. From RFC 3514:
6. IANA Considerations
This document defines the behavior of security elements for the 0x0
and 0x1 values of
It's not listed under the General area because the working group disbanded
when its RFCs were finished. IETF working groups do not last forever;
when their work is done, they're shut down. The last charter is at
https://www.ietf.org/wg/concluded/ipr.html
As for IETF management support -- Rob
On Dec 29, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Dave Crocker d...@dcrocker.net wrote:
Going Beyond Disney in Orlando
Quick, name five reasons to go to Orlando. Here are mine: Puerto Rican
delicacies, alternative cinema, craft beer, African-American history and
psychic readings...
On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:03 PM, Keith Moore mo...@network-heretics.com wrote:
On 12/04/2012 12:50 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
I started making up really good slides (in a variety of settings)
after noticing non-native-English speakers at the IETF taking
pictures of the screen -- it
*really
On Dec 2, 2012, at 12:21 PM, John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com wrote:
--On Sunday, December 02, 2012 08:35 -0800 SM s...@resistor.net
wrote:
It is not about different dialects of English. There are
people in one part of the world who speak English. There are
people from other parts
On Nov 2, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Paul Aitken pait...@cisco.com wrote:
John,
Why does the mailing list memberships reminder send passwords in the
clear?
Because that's what Mailman does. Send code.
And that's acceptable to the IETF? You're kidding me, right?
Because the security is
On Sep 11, 2012, at 11:37 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker hal...@gmail.com wrote:
Some happy news about an IETF-er for a change:
http://idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/09/ftcs-new-chief-technologist-deterrence-isnt-perfect.php?ref=fpb
Congrats Steve.
Thanks!
Yes, for the next year I'll
On Aug 5, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
In other words: I expect that it will be not more than 20 years from
now that we will hear cries of Why were we so wasteful with IPv6
addresses in the beginning? This is why I disagree with Phillip
Hallam-Baker's opinion.
aol
whatever the
On Aug 2, 2012, at 1:24 PM, David Conrad wrote:
On Aug 2, 2012, at 11:44 AM, j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) wrote:
we should instead focus on the ways that the technical architecture of
the Internet creates control points that are vulnerable to capture and
consider ways in which
On Aug 2, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
The whole concept of a global network, with no centralized control, that
permits (nay, encourages) the free flow of information is anathema to
many national governments. They are desperate to choke that off, by any
means necessary.
From
On Aug 2, 2012, at 4:09 PM, Ralph Droms wrote:
On Aug 2, 2012, at 11:07 AM 8/2/12, Eggert, Lars wrote:
Looks good to me, but I agree with whoever suggested to increase the fees. I
think you could easily double or triple them.
I agree with Lars and the suggestion that the fees could be
Also note that RFC 3924 exists.
On Jul 31, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Loa,
I can't speak for Scott, but I think the problem arises if any
IANA assignments are needed, regardless of RFC status. That's
because RFC 2804 speaks of the process for creating and maintaining
IETF
There are a number of very weird entries that require special handling. I
(also) wrote a Python script to convert the XML file to bibtex and had to deal
with a number of these special cases. For example, RFC 4534 lists the authors
as A Colegrove, H Harney instead of A. Colegrove, H. Harney.
On Jun 15, 2012, at 5:24 48AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
On 06/15/2012 08:46 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
On Jun 15, 2012, at 12:44 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 6/14/12 3:37 PM, IETF Secretariat wrote:
List address: ietf-...@ietf.org
Is no one thinking ahead to the 822nd meeting of the IETF in
On Feb 16, 2012, at 8:30 39PM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Steven Bellovin wrote:
Thus, IPv6 was mortally wounded from the beginning.
The history is vastly more complex than that. However, this particular
decision
was just about the last one the IPng directorate made before reporting back
Scott, if memory serves you and I wanted the high-order 2 bits of the IPng
address to select between 64, 128, 192, and 256-bit addresses -- and when
we couldn't get that we got folks to agree on 128-bit addresses instead of
64-bit, which is what had been on the table.
On Feb 14, 2012, at 1:37
On Feb 15, 2012, at 5:44 53PM, Ross Callon wrote:
But the maximum for implementation is not necessarily the maximum for the
packet format.
Thus one could have started with a variable length address format, but said
For the immediate future we will always pick a length of 32 bits. Then
On Feb 15, 2012, at 7:43 30PM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Steven Bellovin wrote:
Scott, if memory serves you and I wanted the high-order 2 bits of the IPng
address to select between 64, 128, 192, and 256-bit addresses -- and when
we couldn't get that we got folks to agree on 128-bit addresses
On Feb 7, 2012, at 2:12 59PM, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:45 -0800 james woodyatt
j...@apple.com wrote:
...
TAI has a fairly stable foundation in non-relativistic
physics, which experience has shown to be somewhat resistant
to the power of political
On Jan 26, 2012, at 9:26 41PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Barry Leiba barryle...@computer.org wrote:
I am not a lawyer, but I don't think the license terms are at issue
here. As I understand it, the terms that Huawei has been specifying
in its disclosures are
On Jan 19, 2012, at 11:54 35AM, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Thursday, January 19, 2012 11:04 -0500 Noel Chiappa
j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu wrote:
For those who haven't seen it, here:
Next battle over Net ramps up worldwide
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/71625.html
is an
Let me clarify what I said (and include context that I should have
put in my earlier note).
Security mechanisms are not designed in a vacuum. One has to consider
the users, the threats, and the usage scenarios. To take an absurd
example, while I can do Caesar ciphers in my head I'm quite
Let me call attention to this sentence, too:
It also SHOULD be
topologically close so that a minimum of validated routing data
are needed to bootstrap a router's access to a cache.
That is, there are other, quite important, reasons to keep the cache
very close to the router(s) it
On Nov 29, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 03:53:14PM +, Dave Cridland wrote:
Welcome to Toronto - ranked 7th most popular place in North America
amongst a non-representative self-selecting group of technical
people.
Obviously, not enough Canadians
On Nov 21, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Douglas Otis wrote:
On 11/17/11 4:14 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
PDF/a is something browsers and natively by different OSs that can
directly display. When submitting formats that are not PDF/a, convert
and automatically link to the converted output with a prompt
On Jun 13, 2011, at 12:24 40PM, Ofer Inbar wrote:
I've never been able to get first level tech support at my ISP to
understand latency or packet loss. They only understand can you
load a web page? This does not mean their ISP doesn't provide packet
loss and latency, standard with their
On May 12, 2011, at 10:41 58AM, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 16:43 -0400 Steven Bellovin
s...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
It is a lot more time (and money) saving to search free
versions before entering transactions to purchase them than
to rely blindly on PubMed, IEEE
On May 10, 2011, at 5:22 43PM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Bob Braden wrote:
I wonder how many other IEEE standards contain similar
RFC-for-pay references..
It's common (much more than 50% for academic ones, IMHO) that
sold articles are freely available on-line.
For example, a PDF file of
On May 8, 2011, at 7:44 58PM, John Levine wrote:
Today if you're an IEEE type, and you wonder where to find RFC 793, or
you're wondering what RFC 793 is about, and you look it up in IEEE
Xplore, the online library that all electrical engineers use, and that
their employers have site
On Jan 1, 2011, at 9:01 20AM, Mans Nilsson wrote:
Subject: Re: Question about Prague Date: Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:30:07PM
-0500 Quoting Scott Brim (scott.b...@gmail.com):
On 12/31/2010 13:37 EST, Elwyn Davies wrote:
Driving into the Czech Republic shouldn't be a problem BUT you do have
to
On Sep 24, 2010, at 5:17 19PM, John Levine wrote:
IANAL but would think that such practice should expose the operator
of the server or proxy to civil and/or criminal action, both from the
operators of the zones whose RRs are being misrepresented, and from
the users' whose applications are
On May 10, 2010, at 5:05 52AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 10 mei 2010, at 5:01, ty...@mit.edu wrote:
I talked to a cab driver in Boston, and he's not very happy with
credit cards, because he was forced to use a new system for credit
cards, and it takes what he considered an unfairly
On May 10, 2010, at 11:54 52AM, Bob Braden wrote:
Is there no bottom to this particular rat hole? Enough, already!
We first have to discuss if the credit cards have to be in ASCII vs. HTML or
PDF.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
On Apr 18, 2010, at 1:31 59PM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
On 04/18/2010 06:58 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
Is there a standard way to publish a call for discussion memo?
Yes, an internet-draft, perhaps containg prose such as this draft is
intended to initiate discussion. At
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/03/25/science/AP-US-NASA-Pricey-Snacks.html
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:03 PM, Dave Nelson wrote:
Sent from my iPhone, wherein trimming posts is a challenge. :-)
On Mar 9, 2010, at 7:51 PM, Glen Zorn g...@net-zen.net wrote:
Suddenly I'm nostalgic for the days when bar BOFs were impromptu
affairs that sprang up in, well, _bars_ were of
On Dec 18, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Dec 18, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
Richard == Richard L Barnes rbar...@bbn.com writes:
Richard Here's (what the ITU claims is) the specific proposal that
Richard has been made to the ITU: An
On Dec 18, 2009, at 10:24 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
(except it's not a joke)
Chinese proposal to meter Internet traffic
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/8417680.stm
China wants to meter all internet traffic that passes through its
borders, it has emerged.
The move
On Dec 14, 2009, at 8:10 PM, Loa Andersson wrote:
All,
Hi -
From: Richard L. Barnes rbar...@bbn.com
To: IETF Member Dave Aronson ietf2d...@davearonson.com
Cc: IETF Discussion ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF
On Nov 9, 2009, at 2:24 AM, Ray Pelletier wrote:
The IAOC is pleased to announce the ancient and historic city of
Beijing as the site for IETF 79 from 7 - 10 November 2010.
Nov 7-10? Sunday-Wednesday? That's unusually short for an IETF
meeting.
--Steve Bellovin,
On Oct 14, 2009, at 1:59 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
The IESG iesg-secret...@ietf.org writes:
- 'Certified Electronic Mail '
draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec-05.txt as a Proposed Standard
This documents appears to utilize several e-mail header fields:
X-Ricevuta
X-Riferimento-Message-ID
41 matches
Mail list logo
