On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, James Seng wrote:
One of the original reason that i-mode didnt go pure IP is they couldnt
get enough IP address for it (they designed i-mode to handle 6M users
originally) and that is quite huge for APNIC.
IPv6 has been around for quite some time now, do you know what
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Barathy, RamaSubramaniam wrote:
Soon we need to have the interplanetary ip address allocation methods
even for our planet (The work of Vinton cerf colleagues in NASA) for
so many devices popping up.
This brings up some more problems I don't even want to start thinking
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
The mere fact that something is technically possible doesn't mean that it
should be done.
Definitely - what benefit can I get from my toaster having Internet
conectivity when I will be able to use my blender to read mail?
--
steven
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
I don't understand why the FBI feels that it needs to have a top-secret
black box attached to the ISP's network. Why not just have the ISP provide
a copy of all e-mail to or from the specified mailbox?
Because other people will know when they're
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Stewart Nolan wrote:
The web sits atop the internet, as do the protocols mentioned, as does
WAP.
Yes - the Internet in my mind is just a collection of protocols, be they
what they may. Over what physical medium data travel is irrelevant, but
doesn't the term "on the
