The intended status of the draft itself is Informational rather than Historic,
surely?
The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Reclassification of RFC 3525 to Historic '
<draft-taylor-megaco-obsol3525-01.txt> as a Historic
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2007-06-08. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead. In either case, please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-taylor-megaco-obsol3525-01.txt
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=15996&rfc_flag=0
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
