Does UL go after companies that produce unsafe devices. My guess would
be no. As far as UL is concerned, companies voluntarily bring their
products to them for certification. It is the consumers and legal
authorities that give UL such a big stick. And with this model, UL
seems to be fairly
Perry E. Metzger wrote:
They can't avoid it. They need to get their work done. They have no
way of getting registered addresses. They're told to use NAT by
organizations like ARIN, and so they do the only thing they can.
I have a hard time believing ARIN is telling people to use NAT, when
John Day wrote:
Cmon, surely you can come up with a better counterargument than that! ;-))
I certainly could. If it is architecturally acceptable for those protocols
to rewrite the address field at every hop, why shouldn't it be for IP? How
does it differ? Basically a NAT is doing what
