Masood Ahmad Shah wrote:
This link is pointing to something important which we should consider in
every IETF and RFC document.
http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/archive/2008/12/30/multi-vendor-ospf-implementation-on-juniper-cisco-part-1.aspx
Actually it's just pointing to your blog.
__
I don't know anything about patents and how they all work -- so I am
probably speaking out of place. Is it possible to just have RedPhone
re-issue the Licensing Declaration with "better" wording?
Willie
John Sullivan wrote:
The Free Software Foundation and the GNU Project oppose publication
David Morris wrote:
Seems like a unique mailbox per lastcall would be very helpful all around.
Right now, gathering and evaluating comments must be a nightmare. An
alternative, would be a single LC mailbox as suggested, but require EVERY
subject line to carry the last call ID, preferable in a f
Simon Josefsson wrote:
Nobody forces you to use the GPL, so if you perceive a problem I suggest
to use another license for your program.
Unless your starting code is using the GPL, then you are forced to use
the GPL and are not *free* to use any other license without permission
from the copyr
Basic abstract of the e-mail:
In RFC 1183, an experimental DNS RR type is defined called the Route
Through (RT) RR. Although not its original purpose, could this be
expanded and used to ease the IPv4 to IPv6 transition?
---
A simple state table gives us 9 possibilities:
# | Endpoint A | Endpo
Willie Gillespie wrote:
So, concerning Case #3 and Case #7, which is basically a IPv4 host on
one end and a IPv6 host on the other:
If a IPv6-only host wants to connect to a IPv4-only host, could an RT
record be used to point the IPv6 machine to a suitable IPv6-to-IPv4
gateway?
* Perhaps a
As someone new to the IETF, how should I go about doing the following?
I want to find some information about IMAP and its extensions. Let's
say I found RFC 1730. How would I know that it had been obsoleted by
RFC 2060 and then by RFC 3501? How do I find the extensions? I don't
necessarily want
Thanks to all who have responded to my question, either directly or to
the list. They have been very helpful.
Willie
Willie Gillespie wrote:
> As someone new to the IETF, how should I go about doing the following?
>
> I want to find some information about IMAP and its extensions. Le
Ned Freed wrote:
>> er, NO. SMTP has no dependence on what may or may
>> not exist in the DNS. Forcing SMTP to depend on DNS
>> is a huge mistake. And yes Virginia, I plan on removing
>> A rr's from my zones (eventually)
>
> You know, that's a very interesting point. One of
Keith Moore wrote:
> because conditions are different now than it was when RFC 974 was
> written, and the case that compelled fallback to A in RFC 974 does not
> significantly exist for .
I agree with Keith here.
The published RFC 2821 states in section 5:
"... The lookup first attempts
Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 02:13:47PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:01:30PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:32:10PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you can cite verifiable
7.txt
Being new, I just read over this document and found it extremely
informative. I wonder if it should be suggested as individuals
subscribe to the main IETF list.
Is that a bad idea?
Willie Gillespie
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://w
12 matches
Mail list logo
