Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-12

Thanks David. - JOuni On Sep 20, 2013, at 2:57 AM, "Black, David" wrote: > And the -12 version is likewise ready for publication as an Informational RFC. > > Thanks, > --David > >> -Original Message- >> From: Black, David >> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 12:41 PM >> To: Ben Campbel

Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-11

Great. Thanks! - Jouni On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:40 PM, "Black, David" wrote: > The -11 version of this draft addresses all of the nits and editorial comments > noted in the Gen-ART review of the -10 version. It's ready for publication as > an Informational RFC. > > Thanks, > --David > >> ---

Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process

Jari, This was an interesting (and a needed) writeup. I also want to share my view as an IETF newbie who has had a chance to experience IETF document process a few times. Sorry for chiming in late.. For the most part I got the feeling that we have the right tools and a working process already in

Re: GenART last call review of draft-ietf-behave-nat64-learn-analysis-03

Roni, Thanks for the review. We'll take care of the editorials. - Jouni On Mar 13, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Roni Even wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > . > > >

Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-03

Thanks Ben for a thorough review. Very good comments indeed. We'll come back to this in a bit.. you know -00 deadline approaching and such ;) - Jouni On 2/29/12 1:34 AM, "ext Ben Campbell" wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the F

Re: WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (dime)

an >> >> >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: jouni korhonen [mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 4:50 PM >>> To: Stephen Farrell; Romascanu, Dan (Dan) >>> Cc: Jouni Korhonen; lionel.mor.

Re: WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (dime)

mailto:iesg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of >> Stephen Farrell >> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 2:13 PM >> To: jouni korhonen >> Cc: jouni.korho...@nsn.com; lionel.mor...@orange-ftgroup.com; >> d...@ietf.org; IETF-Discussion; i...@ietf.org >> Subject: Re:

Re: WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (dime)

Wednesday, >> January 18, 2012. >> >> Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (dime) >> - >> Current Status: Active >> >> Last Modified: 2012-01-10 >> >> Chairs: >> Lionel Morand >> Jouni K

Re: Review of draft-ietf-nextext-radius-pmip6

On Jan 11, 2012, at 9:04 AM, Bernard Aboba wrote: > Message-Authenticator should be mandatory (1 1 1 1). Ack. Thanks Bernard. - Jouni > > > On Jan 10, 2012, at 22:30, "jouni korhonen" wrote: > >> Bernard, >> >> Thank you for your review. S

Re: Review of draft-ietf-nextext-radius-pmip6

Bernard, Thank you for your review. See my comments inline. On Jan 10, 2012, at 8:37 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote: > The document appears to contain typos in sections 4.16 and 4.17. > > In section 4.16, it appears that "Home LMA IPv6 address" should be replaced > by "Home DHCPv6 server address"

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: (IPv6 in 3GPP Evolved Packet System) to Informational RFC

Dear Gang, On Aug 9, 2011, at 7:14 PM, GangChen wrote: > Dear Jouni, > > In mobile CPE case, MT and TE are separated. That would need > additional requirements in some particular cases, e.g. dynamic IPv6 > address allocation. Separate MT & TE is part of the existing 3GPP specifications. There

Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-02.txt

Hi Spencer, Thanks for the review. See my responses inline. On Aug 4, 2009, at 10:45 PM, Spencer Dawkins wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.htm

Re: Last Call: draft-jones-dime-3gpp-eps-command-codes (Diameter Command Code Registration for Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Evolved Packet System (EPS)) to Informational RFC

Hi Cullen, This is what the forthcoming RFC3588bis will do. Vendor-specific commands, like the 3GPP ones in this case, would be allocated on a First Come, First Served basis by IANA. However, for this specific request, RFC3588bis won't be ready/published soon enough. Cheers, Joun

Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-korhonen-mip4-service-06

Hi Spencer, On Dec 29, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Spencer Dawkins wrote: Hi, Jouni, Thanks for your quick response - I'm OK with most of your proposed changes. I should emphasize that my comments here are Last Call comments that you (and the document shepherd, and the AD) can decide to ignore -

Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-korhonen-mip4-service-06

Hi Spencer, Thanks for the review! See some comments inline. On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Spencer Dawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > http://www.alvestrand.no/i